SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1271

R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
P. Santha Kumari – Appellant
Versus
B. Sugunamma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S. Parineeta.
For the Respondent: Mr. V. Jagapathi.

ORDER :

(R. Raghunandan Rao, J.)

The respondent herein had obtained a decree against the petitioner herein in O.S.No.91 of 2013 for recovery of certain amount of money. It is submitted that the decretal amount was around Rs.6,35,642/-. The respondents herein had filed O.E.P.No.7 of 2023 in the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge at Punganur for recovery of the said amount and had obtained attachment of the salary of the petitioner in the hands of her garnishee, by way of an order dated 21.08.2023.

2. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner moved this Court by way of the present Civil Revision Petition with the contention that that her salary is needed for payment and various other purposes including medical expenses due to which any attachment of the salary of the petitioner would result in grave dislocation for the petitioner.

3. This Court, by an order dated 17.11.2023 had stayed the order of the Executing Court subject to the condition of the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- by 08.12.2023. The said sum was deposited by the petitioner and the respondents herein are permitted to withdraw the same from the Executing Court, without offering any security.

4. As far as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top