SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1340

NYAPATHY VIJAY
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Sabeera – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : A. Anasuya
For the Respondent: N. Sasikala

JUDGMENT :

NYAPATHY VIJAY, J.

1. The present C.M.A is filed under Section 30 of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 questioning the order dated 24.07.2008 passed in W.C.No.7/2004 by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Anantapur.

2. The facts leading to this appeal are as follows:-

    One Shaik Ibrahim was working as a driver in an auto bearing No.AP 02-U-5524 belonging to O.P.No.I. The said auto was insured with the appellant/O.P.No.II. The deceased was being paid Rs.3,500/- per month. On 23.09.2003, while driving the vehicle, the deceased met with an accident as another vehicle came in opposite direction near Thirunampalli Bus stop in a rash and negligent manner and caused the auto to lose control and in the process, the auto turned turtle and the deceased died on the particular spot. A criminal case was registered under Section 304-A IPC against the deceased himself vide Cr.No.42/2003 before Yadiki P.S., The claim was filed by the mother and the sister of the deceased for Rs.3,40,000/-.

3. The Commissioner on the basis of the pleadings framed four issues and marked Exs.A.1 to A.5 in evidence on behalf of the claimants and Exs.B.1 and B.2 on be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top