V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Lella Appi – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
V.R.K. Krupa Sagar, J.
1. Since all the criminal petitions arise in the same crime and as they are heard together, they are now to be disposed of by this common order.
2. These Criminal Petitions, under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. (482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), are filed by the petitioners/A.39, A.30, A.31, A.78, A.51, A.80, A.100, A.86, A.85, A.88, A.94, A.95, A.81, A.83, A.92 and A.93 seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.650 of 2021 of Mangalagiri Rural Police Station, Guntur District. This case pertains to offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 452, 427, 323, 324, 506, 326, 307, 450 and 380 read with 109, 120B, 149 I.P.C.
3. Heard arguments of learned counsels, Sri Naidu Siva Rama Krishna, Sri Kiran Tirumalasetti, Sri Varun Byreddy, Sri Y.Nagi Reddy, Sri Vijaya Lakshmi Pittu, Sri Gajjala Mallikarjuna Reddy, Sri Sasanka Bhuvanagiri, Sri S.Dushyanth Reddy, Sri Deepak Mishra, Sri Y.Nagi Reddy, Sri Ravi Chinnapureddy, Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, Sri B.Sesibhushan Rao and the learned senior counsels, Sri Ponnavolu Sudhakar Reddy, Sri P.Veera Reddy for petitioners. Heard arguments of Sri Sidharth Luthra, the learned Senior Counsel for respondent-St
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia V. State of Punjab
Jafarudheen V. State of Kerala
Jalaluddin Khan V. Union of India
Neeharika Infrastructure Private Limited V. State of Maharashtra
Sanjay Chandra V. Central Bureau of Investigation
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra
Smt. Selvi V. State of Karnataka
Srikanth Upadhyay V. State of Bihar
State of Chhattisgarh V. Aman kumar Singh
State of Telangana V. Habib Abdullah Jeelani (2017) 2 SCC 779
The court denied anticipatory bail due to sufficient evidence of involvement in a politically motivated violent incident, emphasizing the need for public order and the integrity of the investigation ....
The court established that in bail applications, the nature of accusations and the progress of investigation are critical factors, and undue delay in investigation may favor granting bail.
The court emphasized that prolonged detention without conclusive evidence and the absence of flight risk warrant the granting of bail.
The court established that the severity of charges and potential for witness tampering are critical factors in bail considerations, alongside the duration of pre-trial detention.
Anticipatory bail should only be granted under exceptional circumstances; the court must consider the nature of accusations, the applicant's history, and potential risks to public safety and the inve....
Anticipatory bail should be granted only in exceptional circumstances, considering the seriousness of the charges and the potential for witness tampering.
The integrity of the investigation is critical in bail considerations; if tampering or irregularities are present, bail may be denied.
The court established that a fair investigation is crucial in determining bail, especially in politically charged cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.