SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 127 ; 2025 Supreme(AP) 127

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 
CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J.
U.S.V. Balaram - Petitioner
Versus
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Revenue Dept. & Ors.- Respondents
Writ Petition No. 4091 of 2009
Decided On : 06-03-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri P. Roy Reddy.
For the Respondents: Ms. Baliboyina Sravani, Learned Asst. Govt. Pleader for Revenue.

The absence of a non-alienation clause in the original land assignment means it cannot be classified as assigned land under the A.P. Assigned Lands Act, allowing for its registration.

Headnote:

(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, and 300-A - Writ petition challenging the unilateral declaration of private land as government land by revenue authorities, claiming violation of natural justice and property rights - The petitioner contended that the land was privately owned and not subject to the provisions of the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977. (Paras 1-2)

(B) Land Assignment - The court examined the historical context of land assignments and the applicability of non-alienation clauses in relation to the A.P. Assigned Lands Act - It was determined that the assignment made in 1942 did not contain a non-alienation clause, thus exempting it from the Act's restrictions. (Paras 10-29)

(C)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner’s land was not assigned land under the Act and directed the registration of documents related to the land. (Paras 30)

(D)

Issues: The main issues included whether the land was government land and the applicability of the non-alienation clause. (Paras 8-9) (E)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the absence of a non-alienation clause in the original assignment meant the land could not be classified as assigned land under the Act, allowing for its registration. (Paras 28-29) (F)

Result: Writ petition allowed, proceedings set aside, and directions issued for registration of the land. (Para 30)

ORDER :

This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:

“…. to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in unilaterally treating the petitioner’s land an extent of Ac 0.66 cents situated in R.S.No.177/A1, Kanuru Village, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District, as Government land, resulting in issuance of proceedings Rc.E3.1550/2008, dated 04.11.2008 by the 2nd respondent and the consequential action of the 5th respondent in refusing to accept any document for registration in relation to the said land, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently, set aside the 2nd respondent’s proceedings Rc.E3.1550/2008, dated 04.11.2008 and direct the 5th respondent to accept and register any document that may be presented by the petitioner in relation to the said land and pass such other orders.”

2. (a) Petitioner’s mother Late Smt.Uppalapati Rajaratnam, purchased an extent of Acres 0.66 cents in R.S.No.177/A, Kanuru Village, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District, under registered sale deed, vide Document No.3412/1966, dated 07.09.1966, from Nalluru Satyanandam and Nalluru Ratnamma. The said land later sub-divided as R.S.No.177/A1 and after death of Smt.Uppalapati Rajaratnam, the same got devolved upon the petitioner being sole legal heir. The petitioner’s mother purchased aforesaid land from the legal heirs of Nalluru Venkataswamy and it is claimed that the land in question has been private land all through after the same was assigned in favour of Nalluru Venkata Swamy in the year 1942 much prior to the enactment of A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 (for short, ‘the Act’).

(b) Petitioner approached the 5th respondent to know the details of basic register value of subject land with an intention to dispose the same and to his surprise, he was informed that unless no objection certificate was produced from 3rd respondent– Revenue Divisional Officer, no registrations would be entertained. Therefore, the petitioner addressed a letter dated 21.06.2007 to the 3rd respondent seeking permission to alienate his land, in a way sought for NOC. In pursuance to the same, the 3rd respondent upon conducting enquiry and verifying the records submitted report dated 30.10.2008 to the 2nd respondent – Collector for issuing necessary instructions in the matter. Basing on the said report, the 2nd respondent issued impugned proceedings vide Rc.E3.1550/2008, dated 04.11.2008, opining inter alia that assignment was of the period prior to 1964, however, such assignment being conditional and as the alienation took place in the year 1966, in view of the provisions of the Act, the 4th respondent – Tahsildar was directed to initiate proceedings under the Act and take appropriate action including that of regularization in case the conditions under Section 3(5) were met. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

3. The 4th respondent filed counter-affidavit on behalf of respondents 1 to 4 inter alia stating that assignment made to Nalluru Venkata Swamy was prior to the year 1966 and records relating to such assignment were not available, however, on local enquiry it was noticed that the original assignee Nalluru Venkata Swamy used to cultivate the land. It is further stated that the land admeasuring Ac.3.59 cents in R.S.No.177 of Kanuru Village, originally classified as “Anaadheenam”, (Unassessed Waste Dry i.e., U.A.W.D.) as per R.S.R. and later on was sub-divided as R.S.177/A, admeasuring Ac.1.64 cents and R.S.No.177/B, admeasuring Ac. 1.95 cents and pattas were granted to Nalluru Venkata Swamy, vide Patta No.381 and Nalluru Guravaiah, vide Patta No.382 respectively, as such, Nalluru Venkata Swamy was assigned land in R.S.No.177/A admeasuring Acres 1.64 cents. However, later their names were struck off

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top