IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICDATURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA : HYDERABAD
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, T.VINOD KUMAR, JJ.
BHEL Employees Model Mutually Aided Co-Operative House Building Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana and others - Respondents
Writ Petition No.15041 of 2019
Decided on : 07-04-2021
Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 226 and 14 - HMDA Act, 2008 - Sections 19 and 20 - Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 22A, 22A(1)(a) and 71 - Sale agreement - Right, title or interest - Petitioner society also entered into a sale agreement respect of the said plots admeasuring 180 sq. yards each in overall layout admeasuring - Petitioner society approached M/s. SSPDL and expressed their intention to provide housing units for the benefits of its members and requested SSPDL to develop project by constructing individual houses/homes and convey same to its members - Petitioner then entered into a Memorandum of Understanding - Persons/companies under various registered sale deeds as they were entitled to alienate the said assigned lands after expiry of 10 years assignment as per the policy - Submitted by 4th respondent, respondent through has informed HMDA title of land covering only an extent Village and village is under dispute and covered under litigation.
Finding of the Court: Respondent nos.4 to 6 are directed to register conveyance deeds/sale deeds executed by the petitioner-Society in favour of its members in respect of houses constructed/built in land covered by sale deed on file of District Registrar, Sangareddy if they are presented by petitioner - respondent nos.7 to 9 have disputed the title of petitioner to land claimed by it, they supported petitioner’s case insofar as petitioner had challenged inclusion of lands Village Village and adopted contentions of counsel for petitioner – Court make it clear have not expressed any opinion on right, title or interest of respondent petitioner same would have to be decided in an appropriate forum in an appropriate proceeding uninfluenced by any observations made order.
Result: Writ Petition is allowed
ORDER :
M.S.Ramachandra Rao, J.
The background facts
The petitioner is a Co-operative House Building Society registered on 05.06.2012 under the Andhra Pradesh Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies Act, 1995. It has about 1200 Members. It was constituted for the welfare of the employees of Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL), Hyderabad and was formed to provide individual housing facilities to all its members by developing a housing scheme for its members.
2. M/s. SSPDL Limited is a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and owns land in Osmannagar Village and Kollur Village of Ramachandrapuram Mandal of Medak District.
3. The petitioner society approached M/s. SSPDL and expressed their intention to provide housing units for the benefits of its members and requested SSPDL to develop the project by constructing individual houses/homes and convey the same to its members. The petitioner then entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dt.05.09.2004 with M/s. SSPDL under which each member of the petitioner society has to contribute about Rs.24,95,000/- per home/house totaling Rs.299.00 Crores for 1200 homes.
4. The petitioner society also entered into a sale agreement dt.31.10.2014 with M/s. SSPDL in respect of the said plots admeasuring 180 sq. yards each in the overall layout admeasuring Ac.88.26 gts. in Sy.No.30/Part of Osmannagar Village and in Sy.No.191/Part of Kollur Village within specific boundaries.
5. On 31.10.2014, petitioner society also entered into a construction agreement with M/s. SSPDL for the 1200 units at a cost of Rs.155.40 Crores.
6. According to the petitioner, M/s. SSPDL and others were absolute owners and possessors of Ac.93.04 gts. situated in Sy.No.30/Part, Osmannagar Village and in Sy.No.191/Part of Kollur Village of Ramachandrapuram Mandal in the Sangareddy District having purchased it under several registered sale deeds.
7. According to the petitioner, the lands in the above mentioned survey numbers were originally assigned in favour of several Ex-Servicemen in 1972 and thereafter those Ex-Servicemen/assignees duly transferred/sold the said lands to various persons/companies under various registered sale deeds as they were entitled to alienate the said assigned lands after expiry of 10 years from the date of assignment as per the policy of the erstwhile composite State of Andhra Pradesh contained in G.O.Ms.No.743, Revenue Department, dt.30.04.1963 and G.O.Ms.No.1117, Revenue (Assignment) Department, dt.11.11.1993.
8. According to the petitioner, on 05.09.2012 it paid Rs.24.00 Crores to the developer as initial payment and the developer M/s SSPDL applied on 03.04.2013 for a layout to the Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (for short “HMDA”) under Sections 19 and 20 of the HMDA Act, 2008 for undertaking construction of the proposed group houses in the above property.
9. Pursuant to the said application of the developer, the HMDA addressed a letter dt.20.12.2013 to the then District Collector of Medak District seeking instructions and clearance from revenue authorities for issuance of the layout permission.
letter dt.25.01.2014 of Tahsildar, Ramachandrapuram Mandal
10. After due enquiry, the then Tahsildar, Ramachandrapuram Mandal (4th respondent), through letter dt.25.01.2014 sent a detailed report to the District Collector, Medak stating that:
(ii) and thereafter some of the ex-servicemen alienated their assigned lands to various persons through registered sale deeds;
(iii) that mutation orders were also sanctioned in favour of purchasers and implemented in the Revenue records;
(iv) that the original assignees have sold their lands after completion of 20 years during 1992 to 2006;
(v) that they were free to sell their assigned lands after a period of 10 yrs as per G.O.Ms.No.743 dt.13.04.1963 and G.O.Ms.No.1117 dt.11.11.1993; and
A.P. State Electricity Board Employees Union v. Joint Collector
Kulwant Singh Chatwal and others v. Joint Collector
Siri Nivasam Mutual Aided House Building Society Ltd. v. State of A.P.
Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar vs. Mohamed Haji Latif and others
Prohibition for assignment of these lands under the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Act, 1977 is not attracted to the said land since the alienations were made by the ex-servicemen more....
Assigned land sold in auction by Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society is ceased to be assigned land on its sale.
The absence of a non-alienation clause in the original land assignment means it cannot be classified as assigned land under the A.P. Assigned Lands Act, allowing for its registration.
The court affirmed that the assignment of land to ex-servicemen and their legal heirs is protected under government orders, allowing for ownership claims despite administrative disputes.
Point of Law- Several illegal transactions were taken place in violation of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 as amended in Act 8 of 2007. Hence....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.