Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Ms Justice B S Bhanumathi, J
APSRTC – Appellant
Versus
Anumalasetty Vinaya Chaitanya – Respondent
Judgment :
(B.S. BHANUMATHI, J.)
1. MACMA 707 of 2005:
This appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the order and decree dated 28.10.2004 in MVOP No.1066 of 2002 on the file of Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional District Judge, Vijayawada by the respondent Nos.1 and 2 therein.
2. MACMA No.1318 of 2008:
This appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the order and decree dated 28.10.2004 in MVOP No.1066 of 2002 on the file of Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional District Judge, Vijayawada by the Claimant therein.
3. Since both the appeals arise out of the same decree and order, a common judgment is pronounced.
4. The claimant filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short MV Act), seeking compensation of Rs.25,00,000,/- for the injuries sustained by her in a motor vehicle accident. Her case is briefly as follows:
5. On 18.09.1998, at about 4.30 pm, while she was returning from the college to go to Raman Academy, where she was taking special tuition for BCA course, by travelling as a pillion rider on the scooter driven by her father, at the traffic signals,
Permanent disability resulting from a motor vehicle accident necessitates comprehensive compensation, including medical expenses, pain, suffering, and loss of future earnings.
![Betham Ravi [died] vs Shaik Nazeer Bhasha - 2025 Supreme(AP) 643](https://supremetoday-s3.b-cdn.net/Andhra_Pradesh_3.png)
The court emphasized that compensation for permanent disability must adequately reflect the impact on earning capacity, mandating a realistic evaluation based on facts and circumstances.
The distinction between permanent disability and loss of earning capacity is critical, with compensation assessments requiring evidence of actual impact on earnings.
The court emphasized that compensation for personal injury must be just and equitable, reflecting the claimant's loss of earning capacity and future prospects, while ensuring the assessment of perman....
Court found that the Tribunal's assessment of notional income and disability was inadequate, resulting in an enhanced compensation award.
Just compensation – Quantum of compensation must be commensurate with degree of injuries suffered by victim of motor accident.
Compensation in personal injury cases should fully and adequately restore the claimant to the position prior to the accident, considering both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages.
The assessment of disability and determination of compensation should consider the multiplier method and relevant Supreme Court judgments.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
