Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY, J
Musunuri Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Tummala Indira Devi – Respondent
ORDER :
This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the order dated 19.07.2023 in E.P.No.13 of 2022 in A.T.C.No.2 of 2003 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ponnur, whereunder an application filed under Order XXI Rule II Clause 1 Section 2 (12), Order 20 Rule 12 and Section 151 C.P.C., by the Petitioner seeking to pass decree for payment of mesne profits from the scheduled land for the years 2006-07 and 2021-22 in favour of decree holder, against Respondent Nos.2, 4 and 5 was dismissed.
2. The introductory facts: The Petitioner filed A.T.C.No.2 of 2003 under Sections 16 and 15 of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, 1956 (for short ‘the Act’) against Respondent No.1 alone seeking to declare that the price of the scheduled land i.e. Rs.1,25,000/- per acre is reasonable and the same is accepted by the Respondent and for other consequential reliefs. As per the petition, the husband of Respondent No.1 late Dr.T.Veeraiah, Dr.T.Suryanarayana, Dr.T.Sashagiri Rao and T.Satya Narayana (Retired Engineer) were brothers.
3. The 1st Respondent was given General Power of Attorney by Dr.T.Suryanarayana to manage the properties, while Dr.T.Veeraiah died testate on 04.02.2002.
Mesne profits are inherent in restitution and can be awarded even without a specific decree for possession, based on the principle of unjust enrichment.
The inherent power of courts to restore possession is affirmed, allowing rectification of wrongful dispossession even outside strict provisions of the Civil Procedure Code.
Intentional violation of an injunction order must be established for enforcement under Order XXI Rule 32 CPC.
The court established that a valid auction sale under the Income Tax Act confers ownership rights, overriding claims of tenancy without proper evidence.
The court ruled that conditions for stay of execution cannot include mesne profits payments without proper ascertainment, ensuring rights of both parties are preserved during appeals.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Order XX Rule 12 (1) (c) CPC in relation to the entitlement of mesne profits and the period for which they would be payable t....
Mesne profits must be quantified based on credible evidence reflecting prevailing market rates, with the burden of proof resting on the claimant to substantiate the claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
