SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 608

M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, S. C. AGRAWAL
Kavita Trehan (Mrs) – Appellant
Versus
Balsara Hygiene Products LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK GROVER, HARISH N.SLAVE, SUNIL JAIN, Vijay Hansaria

JUDGMENT

VENKATACHALIAH, C.J.I.:- Civil Appeal No. 1581 of 1993 arises out of and is directed against the appellate judgment of the Division Bench dated 29th January, 1992 of the High Court of Delhi dismissing RFS [OS] No. 36/91 preferred by the present appellants and affirming the judgment and decree dated 28th May, 1991 of the learned single Judge dismissing the appellants Original Suit No.39/90. There was a further order by the Division Bench which declined to entertain fresh and further arguments in the appeal which were sought by the present appellants by means of C.M. No. 3209/92. That Order is assailed in Civil Appeal No. 1582 of 1993. The appeals raise a short and interesting question as to the scope of Restitutionary jurisdiction of the Courts.

2. On 27th March, 1989, the appellants instituted Civil Suit No. 74/1989 in the Court of Senior Sub-Judge, Chandigarh. Simultaneously, appellants sought an injunction u under Rules 1 and 2, order 39, C.P.C. The averments in the plaint were that the plaintiff appellant "M/s. Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd. - as the latters clearing and forwarding agents for the respondents products, such as, tooth-pasts, tooth-powder, tooth-brushes, mos


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top