IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI, J.
Koneru Maruthi Prasad @ Maruthi Rao, S/O Venkataramaiah - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh - Respondents
Criminal Petition No.4309 of 2023
Decided on : 24-02-2025
(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120-B, 341, 307, 353 r/w.34 - Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - Sections 59, 63 and 31 (Z) (V) - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20(b)(ii)
(C) r/w.8(c) - Quashing of charge sheet - Petitioners sought to quash the charge sheet in NDPS S.C.No.11/2019, alleging that the charges under the Food Safety and Standards Act and NDPS Act were not sustainable due to lack of evidence and procedural violations. (Paras 1-24)
(B) Legal principles - The court held that the Food Safety and Standards Act does not apply to tobacco products, and violations of mandatory provisions under the NDPS Act vitiate the trial. (Paras 7, 22)
(C)
Findings of Court:
The charge sheet against the petitioners under the Food Safety and Standards Act and NDPS Act was quashed due to lack of evidence and procedural non-compliance, while proceedings under IPC were allowed to continue. (Paras 23-24)
(D)
Issues: The main issues were the applicability of the Food Safety and Standards Act to tobacco products and the procedural compliance under the NDPS Act. (Paras 10, 22) (E)
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the Food Safety and Standards Act does not govern tobacco products and that failure to comply with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act invalidates the prosecution. (Paras 15, 22) (F)
Result: The Criminal Petition is partly allowed; proceedings under the Food Safety and Standards Act and NDPS Act are quashed, but IPC proceedings continue. (Para 24) (G) Parties involved: Petitioners/A-1 to A-33 and State/respondent.
ORDER:
The Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/A-1 to A-33 U/s.482 of Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’) to quash the charge sheet in NDPS S.C.No.11/2019 on the file of learned I Addl.District & Sessions Judge, at Chittoor.
02. Heard Sri P.Venkateswarlu, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners and Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State/respondent.
03. The contention of the petitioners is that they were prosecuted for the offence under sections 120-B, 341, 307, 353 r/w.34 of Indian Penal Code , 1860 (for short, “I.P.C.”), sections 59, 63 and 31 (Z) (V) of Food Safety and Standards Act 2006 (for short, “the FSSA, 2006”) and U/s.20(b)(ii)(C) r/w.8(c) of NDPS Act, 1985.
04. The gravamen of the charge is that on 16.01.2018 at about 03.00 p.m. Inspector of Police, Puttur Rural Circle (L.W-16), SI of Police, Puttur and SI of Police, Narayanavanam have conducted raid on un-named factory situated near Weavers Colony, Kailasakona Village, Narayanavanam Mandal, and found A-3 to A-7 and A-9 to A-31 indulged in manufacturing the prohibited items like gutka and pan masala inside the factory; then the accused wrongfully obstructed the police from entering into the factory premises and attempted to kill the police; thereafter police apprehended them and interrogated them in the presence of mediators; A-3 confessed that two months back A-1 established an unauthorized factory without any name for manufacturing the prohibited items like gutka and pan masala and engaged other accused as workers; accordingly, all the accused started to work daily from 08.00 p.m. to 05.00 a.m. and loaded the manufactured goods into lorry No.TN 22 DD 8888 belongs to A-8 and sent them to other places for sales through A-2 and A-8; police seized gutka items and 2 KGs of ganja dried leaves in the presence of mediators and collected samples and sent for analysis; a case was registered vide Cr.No.4/2018 dated 16.01.2018 for the above offence against 31 accused and others including the petitioners; conducted investigation into the offence; and on conclusion, laid charge sheet before the learned I Addl.District & Sessions Court, Chittoor.
05. The contention of the petitioners/A-1 to A-33 is that the case was registered for the offence U/secs.59, 63 and 31 (Z) (V) of Food Safety and Standards Act , 2006 on the allegation that gutka packets contained tobacco products, as it is against Food Safety and Standards Act , 2006: It is not sustainable in law as this Court in several judgments quashed cases holding that the offence U/secs.59, 63 and 31 (Z) (V) of Food Safety and Standards Act , 2006 is not applicable to the tobacco products.
06. The other contention of the petitioners is that charge sheet filed for the offence U/s.20 (b)(ii)(C) r/w.8(c) of NDPS Act, 1985 is also not sustainable in law, as no contraband was seized from the possession of the petitioners; and further, police did not follow mandatory provisions under NDPS Act, 1985; therefore, they approached this Court for quashing of charge sheet against the petitioners herein, as it amounts to abuse of process.
07. Sri P.Venkateswarlu, learned Senior Counsel would submit that Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.30185/2021 and other writ petitions vide common order dated 24.03.2023 held that “Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 (for short, “the COTPA, 2003”) is a special Act dealing with tobacco and tobacco products. Whereas Food Safety and Standards Act , 2006 is a general Act and seizure of tobacco products by the police under Food Safety and Standards Act , 2006 is bad in law and no coercive action be taken under the said Act” and quashed the criminal proceedings, which were registered by the police under the provisions of Food Safety and Standards Act , 2006 for transportation of pan masala containing tobacco
The Food Safety and Standards Act does not apply to tobacco products, and violations of mandatory provisions under the NDPS Act invalidate the prosecution.
Prosecution under IPC and FSSA for tobacco products is unsustainable; mandatory provisions of NDPS Act must be followed to maintain charges.
Point of Law : Food Adulteration - Negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life –Criminal Proceedings Quashed - Act done by petitioners i.e., transportation of khaini and che....
Compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act is essential for establishing the prosecution's case, particularly the requirement for drawing samples in the presence of a Magistrate, which was ....
Non-compliance with mandatory procedures under the NDPS Act leads to vitiation of conviction, requiring strict adherence to evidence collection protocols.
Recovery of Ganja – Samples drawn in presence of Magistrate and list thereof on being certified alone would constitute primary evidence for the purposes of trial.
Non-compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act, specifically Section 52A, can lead to the exclusion of seized contraband as valid evidence in trial.
The prosecution established the appellant's conscious possession of narcotics, validating the conviction despite procedural non-compliance, as substantial evidence supported the case.
Non-compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act, requiring samples to be drawn and certified by a Magistrate, vitiates the trial as it fails to produce primary evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.