Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K. MANMADHA RAO
Dr. K. Rajamanikyam – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims violation of seniority (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. petitioner's counsel argues for closure (Para 9) |
| 3. court considers employment status (Para 12) |
| 4. writ petitions closed (Para 13) |
ORDER:
“…. to issue Writ order or orders specially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in not appointing the petitioner as Principal incharge / FAC and appointing the 5th respondent as Principal in charge / FAC in 4th respondent College is illegal arbitrary unconstitutional in violation of Article 14, 19, 21 of the constitution and also in utter violation of the A P Collegiate Education Services Special rules issued in GO MS No 127 dated 07.06.1993 and also the seniority list prepared in the month of December 2020 by the 4th respondent College and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to appoint the petitioner as a Principal incharge / FAC till the regular selections are made in the 4th respondent College and pass……”
“…. to issue appropriate Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned communication in LrRc No 205/Admn IB/20211 dated 01.07.2021 in direc
The court ruled that a writ petition lacks merit if the petitioner is no longer associated with the institution in question.
The Officiating Principal has the right to challenge the appointment of a regularly selected candidate, and appointments made contrary to statutory provisions are invalid.
The court ruled that administrative decisions regarding college principal appointments may be reviewed for compliance with statutory regulations, particularly UGC Guidelines, emphasizing the importan....
Point of law; It is clearly clarified in this judgment also in line with the earlier judgments also that unless and until the original appointment is a “regular recruitment” in accordance with “the r....
Writ of mandamus – Employment and service matter – Appointment of Principle of college - Selection Process - Appointment of Principal in College has to be as per recommendation of Selection Committee....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the government is not obligated to pay the salary of an individual appointed in a non-sanctioned post from the government grant.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the respondent authorities to follow the regular appointment process as mandated by the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialis....
The court affirmed that educational authorities must consistently approve appointments for similarly situated individuals, rejecting arbitrary refusals.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
