Back
P. VELMURUGAN, K. K. RAMAKRISHNAN
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
G. Grace Selin Rani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P. VELMURUGAN, J.
PRAYER in W.A. (MD) No. 409 of 2023 Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 8488 of 2021, dated 26.4.2021.
PRAYER in W.A. (MD) No. 161 of 2023 Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 8591 of 2021, dated 27.4.2021.
PRAYER in W.A. (MD) No. 162 of 2023 Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 8615 of 2021, dated 27.04.2021.
1. These Writ Appeals are directed against the order passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) Nos. 8488, 8591 and 8615, dated 26.04.2021 and 27.04.2021.
2. Since the subject-matter of all these Writ Appeals and the appellants are one and the same, these Writ Appeals are taken up together and this Common Judgement is passed.
3. The Writ Petitioner in W.P. (MD) No. 8488 of 2021 and the Ist Respondent in the Writ Appeal in W.P. (MD) No. 409 of 2023 was appointed as P.G. Assistant (Zoology) in the second respondent school and her appointment was approved on 2.10.2001. Subs
The court affirmed that educational authorities must consistently approve appointments for similarly situated individuals, rejecting arbitrary refusals.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that administrative instructions cannot override statutory rules, and the rejection of an appointment must be in accordance with the applicable rul....
Service Law - Appointment order issued by a person not authorized to do the same would be nullity and not an irregularity.
The court reaffirmed that judicial decisions regarding employment rights must be respected, and that grounds for termination or denial of appointment must be substantiated with valid evidence, partic....
Service Matter1 - Under Section 106 of the Schedule “F”, it is nowhere provided that if the appointment of Teacher is made in Non Granted School, then Teacher cannot be given an appointment in the gr....
The court affirmed deemed approval for teacher appointments due to the respondent's failure to act within legal timelines and ruled that objections for rejection were legally invalid.
Termination of services during probation must have prior approval from the educational authority, and lack of compliance renders such termination unlawful.
The main legal point established is that routine affairs of an institution, including appointments and approvals, should be considered independently of disputes in management.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
