BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
P. VELMURUGAN, K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JJ.
The State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
G. Grace Selin Rani – Respondent
W.A. (MD) Nos. 161, 162, 409 of 2023, C.M.P. (MD) Nos. 2131, 2133, 4442 of 2023
Decided On : 01-10-2024
JUDGMENT :
P. VELMURUGAN, J.
PRAYER in W.A. (MD) No. 409 of 2023 Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 8488 of 2021, dated 26.4.2021.
PRAYER in W.A. (MD) No. 161 of 2023 Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 8591 of 2021, dated 27.4.2021.
PRAYER in W.A. (MD) No. 162 of 2023 Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 8615 of 2021, dated 27.04.2021.
1. These Writ Appeals are directed against the order passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) Nos. 8488, 8591 and 8615, dated 26.04.2021 and 27.04.2021.
2. Since the subject-matter of all these Writ Appeals and the appellants are one and the same, these Writ Appeals are taken up together and this Common Judgement is passed.
3. The Writ Petitioner in W.P. (MD) No. 8488 of 2021 and the Ist Respondent in the Writ Appeal in W.P. (MD) No. 409 of 2023 was appointed as P.G. Assistant (Zoology) in the second respondent school and her appointment was approved on 2.10.2001. Subsequently, she was promoted as Headmistress in the above said school on 20.07.2015. The second respondent school sent a proposal to the respondents 1 to 4 therein for approval of her promotion on 3.8.2015. Since the respondents 1 to 4 therein failed to pass any order, she has filed a Writ Petition in W.P. (MD) No. 17404 of 2015 seeking a direction to pass orders on the proposal of the Writ Petitioner and this Court by order, dated 5.3.2018 passed orders directing the respondents to consider the proposal submitted by the second respondent school within a period of four weeks. In the meanwhile, dispute arose between the two rival groups of the school and the principal Bench of this Court appointed the seventh respondent therein as Administrator of IELC. The Principal Bench of this Court, on the litigation initiated by one of the groups, appointed the seventh respondent as Administrator and Administrator also after verifying the records, approved the appointment of the Petitioner with effect from 2.7.2015 by proceedings, dated 17.6.2020.The Headmistress as well as the Administrator sent a proposal to the respondents 3 and 4 therein to approve the appointment by way of promotion as Headmistress to the sixth respondent school on 20.7.2015 and the same was not considered till date. Hence the Writ Petition.
4. The Writ Petitioner in W.P. (MD) No. 8591 of 2021 and appellant in W.A. (MD) No. 161 of 2023 was appointed as P.G. Assistant (Zoology) in the fifth respondent school with effect from 8.7.2015 and thereafter, the school submitted necessary proposal on 3.8.2015 to the respondents 3 and 4 therein. Since no order was passed on the same, the Petitioner filed W.P. (MD) No. 17407 of 2015 seeking for a direction to approve the appointment of the Petitioner and this Court by order, dated 5.3.2018 directed the respondents therein to consider the proposal submitted by the fifth respondent school within a period of four weeks from the date of order. Thereafter, dispute arose between rival groups and an Administrator was appointed and the learned Administrator also sent proposal to the third respondent therein Chief Educational Officer to approve her appointment of the Petitioner from the date of initial date of appointment .Since the same was not considered the present Writ Petition is filed.
5. The Petitioner in W.P. (MD) No. 8615 of 2021 and first respondent in W.A. (MD) No. 162 of 2023 was appointed as P.G. Assistant (commerce) in the fifth respondent school on 20.7.2015 and the facts are similar to the facts in W.P. (MD) No. 8591 of 2021. In this case, the Petitioner has filed W.P. (MD) No. 17405 of 2025 and this Court also by order, dated 5.3.2015 directed the respondents therein to consider the proposal sent by the fifth respondent school; within a period of f
The court affirmed that educational authorities must consistently approve appointments for similarly situated individuals, rejecting arbitrary refusals.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that administrative instructions cannot override statutory rules, and the rejection of an appointment must be in accordance with the applicable rul....
Service Law - Appointment order issued by a person not authorized to do the same would be nullity and not an irregularity.
The court reaffirmed that judicial decisions regarding employment rights must be respected, and that grounds for termination or denial of appointment must be substantiated with valid evidence, partic....
Service Matter1 - Under Section 106 of the Schedule “F”, it is nowhere provided that if the appointment of Teacher is made in Non Granted School, then Teacher cannot be given an appointment in the gr....
The court affirmed deemed approval for teacher appointments due to the respondent's failure to act within legal timelines and ruled that objections for rejection were legally invalid.
A member of an educational agency's managing body is statutorily disqualified from appointment as the head of an institution. Furthermore, courts will not entertain a petition where an adequate, effi....
Termination of services during probation must have prior approval from the educational authority, and lack of compliance renders such termination unlawful.
The main legal point established is that routine affairs of an institution, including appointments and approvals, should be considered independently of disputes in management.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.