Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Dr. V R K Krupa Sagar, J
Gellanki Ravi Kumar @ Ravi – Appellant
Versus
Peddinti Savitramma – Respondent
ORDER :
This Criminal Revision Case, under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), is filed by the petitioner/respondent No.8/proposed party assailing the order dated 21.02.2023 of learned VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, East Godavari District, Rajamahendravaram in Crl.M.P.No.892 of 2022 in S.C.No.102 of 2021.
2. Heard arguments of Sri M.Sreerama Rao, the learned counsel for revision petitioner and Sri K.Pridhvi Raju, the learned counsel for respondent No.1/de facto complainant and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.2-State.
3. Brief facts of the case are required to be noticed:
The marriage between Sri G.Rajkapoor and Smt. Kumari was solemnized on 20.05.2015. In her matrimonial house the married woman suffered an unnatural death on 26.11.2017. Thereupon her mother/respondent No.1 alleging that the accused subjected the deceased to cruelty lodged a written information on 27.11.2017 which was registered as Crime No.179 of 2017 of Jaggampeta Police Station. After due investigation, citing 25 witnesses the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Peddapuram filed a charge sheet before the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Peddapuram f
Trial commences upon framing charges; powers under Section 319 Cr.P.C. cannot be exercised before evidence is recorded.
Court in exercise of the revisional jurisdiction cannot embark upon the inquiry with regard to facts of the case, particularly when the courts below had applied its mind and taken a view, which does ....
The power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is discretionary and should be exercised sparingly based on strong and cogent evidence, and the test for summoning a person is one which is more than prima facie c....
Point of law: Suicide - Summoning of the revisionist - Neither the chief-examination nor the cross-examination of the witness was recorded by the learned trial court, so only on the basis of query by....
Court under revisional jurisdiction cannot substitute its own views particularly when there was ample evidence available on record before the court below in exercising the jurisdiction as conferred u....
The High Court's revisional order allowing summoning of additional accused under Section 319 relates back to the original rejection date, permitting a fresh trial despite the main trial's conclusion.
For invoking power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. inter alia includes the principle that only when strong and cogent evidence occurs against a person from the evidence the power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
