SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 451

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
S.J. Kalappa Modaliar – Appellant
Versus
Dist Collector Chittoor – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : L.J. Veera Reddy
For the Respondent: GP For Arbitration

JUDGMENT :

(T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J.)

1. This Second Appeal was filed by the Appellants/Respondents 1, 7 to 9/Plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 07.12.1999 passed in A.S.No.78 of 1990 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Puttur (for short, 'the First Appellate Court') reversing the Judgment and decree, dated 01.06.1988 passed in O.S.No.38 of 1987 on the file of District Munsif Magistrate, Nagari (for short ‘the Trial Court’).

2. The 1st Appellant is the Plaintiff, who filed the suit in O.S.No.38 of 1987 for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their men and servants or nominees from causing any disturbance to the Plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule properties. 1st Respondent / Appellant is the 6th Defendant in the said suit. Respondents 2 to 6 are Defendants 1 to 5, who remained ex parte in the suit proceedings.

3. It is prudent to refer to the parties as they are initially presented in the suit O.S.No.38 of 1987 to minimize any potential confusion and to enhance the understanding of the case.

4. The factual matrix essential for adjudicating the contentiou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top