K. MANMADHA RAO
S. Nalini – Appellant
Versus
Anthony`s Church – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The Second Appeal has been filed assailing the Judgment and Decree dtd. 2/3/2016, passed in A.S.No.170 of 2010 by the learned IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District (in short "the first appellate court") in confirming the Judgment and decree dtd. 26/7/2010 in O.S.No.873 of 2007 passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati (in short "the trial court").
2. The parties will herein after be referred to as they are arrayed in the Original Suit for the sake of convenience.
3. The Appellant herein is the plaintiff; respondent is the defendant before the trial court.
4. The plaintiff filed the suit for grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its office bearers, agents, followers etc., from trespassing into or in any way interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. The averments in the plaint, in brief are as under:- The plaint occupied the plaint schedule property and in recognition of her possession, the revenue authorities have granted B.Memos dtd. 2/3/1980 and 5/4/1981 and she has been paying cist for the site. After due enquiry, she was also granted a Patta dtd. 14/4/19
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.