SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1485

RAVI NATH TILHARI
Dali Rajamma – Appellant
Versus
Dali Srinivasa Reddy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : (Mrs.) S.A.V. Ratnam

Table of Content
1. filing of applications for evidence (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. need for original documents for expert signature analysis (Para 8 , 9)
3. illegality in orders outside established law (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. application for summoning original evidence (Para 13 , 14)
5. dismissal of civil revision petitions (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Smt. S.A.V. Ratnam, learned Counsel for the petitioners, appearing through virtual mode.

2. Since all these petitions are inter-related, this Court deems it appropriate to hear these matters together and dispose of the same by way of this common order.

3. The petitioners/plaintiffs filed OS No.1580 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the learned II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Visakhapatnam, for partition of the suit schedule properties. At the stage of arguments, the petitioners/plaintiffs filed IA No.558 of 2024, seeking to send Ex.B1 Unregistered Will, dated 02.07.2014 to expert for comparison of signatures thereon with the contemporaneous signatures of Dalli Appala Reddy available with Andhra Bank, Pithapuram Colony Branch, Visakhapatnam, as the alleged Will was said to be fabricated by forging the signatures of Dalli Appa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top