VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Dindi Kiran Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Balaji Sankar Singh – Respondent
ORDER :
Both the revision petitions are filed against the orders dated 25.03.2022 passed by the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, in I.A. No. 103 of 2022 and I.A.No.104 of 2022 in O.S. No. 102 of 2019 respectively.
2. Since the issue involved in both the revision petitions is same and parties to the revision petition are also same, they are heard and disposed of by way of this common order.
3. In brief, the facts of the case are that the respondent filed a suit in O.S.No.102 of 2019 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, against the petitioner for recovery of money under a promissory note. During pendency of the suit, the petitioner filed I.A.Nos.103 of 2022 and 104 of 2022 under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 151 of CPC praying the Court below to send Exhibit A.1- promissory note to the Andhra Pradesh State Forensic and Scientific Laboratory, Mangalagiri, for comparison of his admitted signatures on vakalat and written statement and the signatures to be obtained in open Court and also for comparison of his Left Thumb Impression.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant submits that the signatures of the petitioner on
Ajay Kumar Parmar v. State of Rajasthan
Ajit Savant Majagvai v. State of Karnataka
Bande Siva Shankara Srinivasa Prasad Vs. Ravi Surya Prakash Babu
Guru Govindu Vs. Devarapu Venkataramana
Janachaitanya Housing Limited, Hyderabad Vs. Divya Financiers, Guntur
R.V.Raveendran & P. Sathasivam Thiruvengada Pillai Vs. Navaneethammal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.