Back
MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
Ganasala Krishna – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Hon’ble Labour Court, Guntur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for writ and reinstatement (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of petitioner's employment and charges (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. corporation's defense against allegations (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. parties' arguments presented (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's observations on legal principles and evidence (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. seriousness of offenses and upholding tribunal's award (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. conclusion and dismissal of writ petition (Para 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claiming the following prayer :
2. In the instant writ petition, the Award dated 15.09.2008 made in ID No.71 of 2006 on the file of I
The High Court's role under Article 226 is not to re-evaluate evidence but to ensure that disciplinary proceedings comply with established legal standards and natural justice.
Disciplinary action against an employee must be based on enumerated misconduct; failure to issue correct tickets constitutes valid grounds for penalty.
The appointing authority has discretion in imposing punishment, and courts should interfere only in rare and appropriate cases.
The appointing authority has discretion in imposing punishment, but the court may interfere if the punishment is disproportionate to the charges, and may modify the punishment or remit the case to th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
