IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, J.
Bussa Rajendra and others – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh and others – Respondent
Crl. P No.377 of 2020
Decided On : 02-09-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property dispute. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding false allegations and ownership. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's jurisdiction under section 482. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. assessment of criminal versus civil nature of dispute. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. decision to quash proceedings based on lack of merit. (Para 15) |
| 6. final order to quash the criminal proceedings. (Para 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT /ORDER :
The instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.P.C"), has been filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4, seeking quashment of proceedings against them in CC No.1822 of 2019 on the file of the Court of III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chittoor for the offence under Sections 447 , 379 and 506 read with 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , (for short "IPC").
2. The factual background leading to filing of this petition :
(b) There are toms, Mango and coconut trees in the said land and respondent No.2 has been looking after the said land, as per the directions of respondent No.3. As Accused No.1 has been claiming right over the said land, respondent No.3 filed OS No.621 of 2017 in the Court of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor and the same is pending. While so, on 11.06.2019 at about 10.00 p.m., accused Nos.1 to 4 criminally trespassed into the Mango Garden of respondent No.3, committed theft of Mangoes, lodged them in Tractor and Trailer Bearing Nos.AP-04-B-6101 and AP-04-B-6102 for transporting them illegally for unlawful gain. On coming to know about the same, when respondent No.2 came there and questioned the accused Nos.1 to 4 about their illegal acts, they threatened him with dire consequences and abused in filthy language.
(c) Inspite of the advice of the elders that they will settle the issue on the next day morning and asked the accused to leave the mango load, accused Nos.1 to 4 did not heed to them, took away the mangoes and disposed the same. Again on the same night, the accused committed theft of Mangoes for second time.
(d) On 12.06.2019 at about 08.00 a.m., on coming to know about the above incident, when respondent No.2 and his relatives questioned the accused, all the accused got enraged, abused them in filthy language and threatened with dire consequences that they will do away with their lives, if they object them for transporting the stolen mangoes. Accused Nos.1 to 4 caused loss to the tune of Rs.1 lakh to respondent Nos.2 and 3.
(e) On the report lodged by respondent No.2, a case in Crime No.77 of 2019 of Bangarupalem Police Station, was registered against accused Nos.1 to 4 for the offence under Sections 447 , 379 and 506 read with 34 IPC.
(f) After completion of investigation, the Police filed charge-sheet which was numbered as CC No.1822 of 2019 on the file of the Court of III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chittoor.
(g) Seeking quashment of the CC the present Crl. P is filed.
Grounds sought for quashment :
3. Aggrieved by the registration of the said case, petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 filed the present petition seeking quashment of the proceedings against them, on the following grounds:
(b) Respondent No.3 has been claiming the property without any valid document and possession.
(c) The brother of respondent Nos.2 and 3 namely Ponne Devendraiah lodged a similar complai
Naresh Kumar and another v. State of Karnataka and another
The court can quash criminal proceedings under inherent powers if the allegations stem from a civil dispute and fail to establish a prima facie case for the alleged criminal offences.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process when complaints are motivated by civil disputes.
The court emphasized that inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice, especially when allegations do not con....
Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC do not permit quashing proceedings when prima facie evidence of a crime is present, mandating a trial to ascertain truth.
The existence of civil proceedings does not preclude criminal prosecution when allegations disclose cognizable offences, affirming the concurrent nature of civil and criminal jurisdictions.
Inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. can quash criminal proceedings when no prima facie case is established, preventing abuse of legal process.
The court quashed criminal proceedings against the accused, determining that the allegations were civil in nature and lacked prima facie evidence of criminal wrongdoing.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.