VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
S. Venkata Naga Kishore, S/o. S. Venkateswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. , Rep. by Its Public Prosecutor – Respondent
ORDER :
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, J.
The instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, [for short ‘Cr.P.C’] has been filed by the Petitioner/Accused No.5, seeking quashment of proceedings against him in Crime No.643 of 2019 on the file of Pendurthy Police Station, Visakhapatnam City registered for the offences under Sections 427, 420, 447, 468 and 471 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, [for short ‘IPC’].
2. Facts of the case, in brief, are as follows:
b. After the demise of the vendors of Respondent No.2, their sons i.e., Accused Nos.1 to 3 created forged documents for the said land and executed General Power of Attorney in favour of Accused Nos.4 and 5. That being so, on 20.12.2019 at 10.30 a.m., Accused No.4 and Petitioner/Accused No.5 trespassed into the land of Respondent No.2, damaged the trees, notice boards and cement fencing poles with JCB s
The court emphasized that inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice, especially when allegations do not con....
The court ruled that criminal proceedings should not be used to settle civil disputes and can be quashed if they do not establish a prima facie case of criminal offence.
The court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as the allegations did not constitute a criminal offence and were purely civil in nature.
The court established that quashing of FIRs should be rare, emphasizing the importance of allowing police investigations to proceed unless there are compelling reasons otherwise.
The court affirmed that criminal proceedings cannot be quashed solely on the basis that the allegations may also constitute a civil wrong, emphasizing the need for trial to determine the merits.
The court established that civil disputes should not be pursued as criminal cases to prevent abuse of legal processes.
Inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. can quash criminal proceedings when no prima facie case is established, preventing abuse of legal process.
The court can quash criminal proceedings under inherent powers if the allegations stem from a civil dispute and fail to establish a prima facie case for the alleged criminal offences.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process when complaints are motivated by civil disputes.
Criminal proceedings cannot be maintained when the underlying dispute is purely civil, as it constitutes an abuse of the judicial process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.