SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 1516

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Ganta Kavitha Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Varun Byreddy
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor (AP)

Judgement Key Points

What is the effect of a cheque drawn on a merged bank on liability under Section 138 NI Act? What is the High Court’s approach under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings when the cheque is invalid due to bank merger? What determines the validity of a cheque for purposes of Section 138 of the NI Act in the context of bank mergers?

Key Points: - (!) - (!) - (!) (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!)

What is the effect of a cheque drawn on a merged bank on liability under Section 138 NI Act?

What is the High Court’s approach under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings when the cheque is invalid due to bank merger?

What determines the validity of a cheque for purposes of Section 138 of the NI Act in the context of bank mergers?


JUDGMENT / ORDER :

The instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.'), has been filed by the petitioner/accused, seeking to quash the proceedings against her in CC No.911 of 2022 on the file of the Court of II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, for the offence punishable under Section 138 read with 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'N.I. Act').

2. The facts which led to the filing of this petition, in brief, are as follows :

    (a) On 20.11.2018, petitioner/accused borrowed a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- from respondent No.2/complainant for her family and other expenses and executed a promissory note in his favour on the same day agreeing to repay the same with interest @ 24% per annum.

    (b) On repeated demands of the complainant, the accused issued a Cheque Bearing No.032824, dated 20.09.2021 for Rs.42,00,000/- drawn on State Bank of Hyderabad, Mahabubabad Branch, Warangal District and on presentation for collection in ICICI Bank, Vijayawada, the said cheque was returned with an endorsement "Invalid Cheque (SBH)" under a return memo dated 22.09.2021.

    (c) On 30.09.2021, the complainant got issued a legal notice to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top