SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 570

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ, R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
Sk. khamruddin - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others – Respondent
W.P.Nos:19579, 19640, 19785, 19877, 19930, 19941, 19944, 19952, 19969, 19970, 19976, 19979, 20116, 20139, 20759, 20761, 20812, 20916, 20968, 20976, 20996, 21031 & 21138, 21660 of 2025 Decided on : 13-08-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Th Petitioner: A RAJENDRA BABU
For the Respondent: Tata Venkata Sridevi

Local residency requirements for educational admissions are binding and cannot be bypassed based on the student's educational history alone, reaffirming the statute's intent in defining local candidates.

Headnote:(A) A.P. Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission) Order, 1974 - Regulation 7.3 - Local candidates for MBBS/BDS admissions - Requirement for local candidates to have resided/studied for four consecutive academic years in the local area - Petitioners, having studied outside AP for +2, challenged the validity of the local residency requirement for eligibility - The Court reaffirmed that local status cannot be granted to students meeting the minimum academic criteria without satisfying the local residency regulations stemming from the Presidential Order - The court held that the interpretations of prior decisions, including Bathina Rajya Shilpa and others vs. NTR University which favored residency consideration of candidates, are binding and maintained the defined regulations of local admissions as not arbitrary but lawful. (Paras 8, 10, 14, 18)

(B) Admission Rights - Local Status - Locality for educational admissions must be satisfied strictly according to defined rules, with no exemptions granted based solely on prior education history. (Paras 6, 7, 9, 16)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner students challenged the local residency requirement specified in the notification for MBBS/BDS course admissions which restricts eligibility based on local area education requirements. (Paras 2-5)

Findings of Court:
The requirements for local candidates under Regulation 7.3 were upheld, indicating residency regulations must be adhered to without consideration of prior educational history alone. (Paras 16-18)

Issues: The primary issue was whether students primarily educated outside of Andhra Pradesh could still be classified as local candidates based on prior education in the state. (Paras 12, 14)

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that both regulations and previous judgments require strict adherence to local residency rules, emphasizing that merely having local education duration does not suffice for local status if the residency criteria are unmet. (Paras 10, 18)

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. students challenging local admission requirement (Para 2 , 3 , 5)
2. interpretation of admissions regulations (Para 6 , 8)
3. responses regarding legal precedents (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. analysis of local candidate definitions (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. comparison with other judicial decisions (Para 16 , 17)
6. dismissal of writ petitions (Para 18)

Order :

R. Raghunandan Rao, J.

  1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned Advocate General representing the learned G.P. for Medical, Health and Family Welfareappearing for the respondents and Smt. Tata Venkata Sridevi, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences.

2. As all these writ petitions raise an identical question of law and fact, they are being disposed of by way this common order.

3. In all these cases, the students, who have sought admission into MBBS and BDS Courses for the academic years 2025-26, have approached this Court, challenging the requirement, in the Notification dated 22.07.2025, issued by the Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, for admission into MBBS / BDS Courses, for the academic year 2025-26, prescribing a requirement that the applicant should have studied or resided, in the local area where he/she is seeking to obtain admission, for a period of not less than four consecutive academic years ending with the academic year in which the candidate had appeared for the relevant qualifying examination.

5. In all the above cases, the petitioners are students, who had pursued a major part of their school education in the State of Andhra Pradesh, but had pursued their + 2 education (11th& 12th classes or Intermediate) outside the State of Andhra Pradesh.

6. The petitioners contend that Regulation 7.1 of the said Notification, stipulates that admission to 85% of the available seats are reserved in favour of local candidates, in relation to the “local area” as provided under the A.P. Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission) Order, 1974. Regulation 7.2 divides the entire State of Andhra Pradesh into two local areas, viz., Andhra University Area and Sri Venkateswara University Area. Regulation 7.3 defines “local candidates”.

7. The said Regulation 7.3 reads as follows:

7.3 Local Candidates The Local Candidate Means:

(A) A candidate for admission shall be regarded as a local candidate in relation to a local area. –

(a) If he /she has studied in educational Institution or educational Institutions in such local area for a period of not less than four consecutive academic years ending with the academic year in which he/she appeared or as the case may be, first appeared in the relevant qualifying examination, or

(b) Where, during the whole or any part of the four consecutive academic years ending with the academic year in which he/she appeared or, as the case may be, first appeared for the relevant qualifying examination, he/she has not studied in any educational Institutions, if he/she has resided in that local area for a period of not less than four years immediately he/she appeared or, as the case may be, first appeared.

(B) A Candidate for admission to the course who is not regarded as local candidate under clause (A) in relation to any local area shall, -

(a) If he/she has studied in educational Institutions in the State for a period of not less than seven consecutive academic years ending with the academic year in which he/she appeared or, as the case may be, first appeared for the relevant qualifying examination be regarded as a local candidate in relation to, -

(i) Such local area where he/she has studied for the maximum period out of said period of seven years, or

(ii) Where the period of his/her study in two local areas are equal, such local area, where he/she has studied last in such equal period, or

(c) If, during the whole or any part of seven consecutive academic years ending with the academic year in which he/she appeared or, as the case may be, first appeared for the relevant qualifying examinat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top