SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 477

ALOK ARADHE, J. SREENIVAS RAO
Kalluri Naga Narasimha Abhiram – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Medical and Health Department – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. D.V. Sitharam Murthy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Kondaparthy Kiran Kumar, Mr. B. Mayur Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Alluri Divakar Reddy; Mr. K. Vivek Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Manoj Reddy Keshi Reddy; Mr. A. Venkatesh, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Sinde Mohan Devidhas; Mr. Umesh Chandra P.V.G; Mr. S. Goutham; Mr. E. Sreenivasa Rao; Mr. Lingala Sudheer; Ms. P. Vijaya Lakshmi; Mr. K. Durga Prasad; Mr. Laxmaiah Kanchani; Mr. V. Rohith; Mr. Uzair Ahmed Khan; Mr. Azam Khan, learned counsel representing Mr. T. Rathnaiah; Mr. L. Ram Singh; Mr. A. Suhas Chary, learned counsel representing Mr. Rapolu Bhaskar; Mr. Ramesh Chilla; Ms. P. Kalpana, learned counsel representing Mr. P. Bhaskar; Mr. Kowturu Pavan Kumar; Ms. Chennaboina Shravani; Mr. Vempati Mallikarjun Shastry; Mr. Milan Kumar Jena, learned counsel representing Mr. H. Munwar; Mr. K. Krishna Kalyan, learned counsel representing Mr. K. Venumadhav; Mr. G. Dinesh Patil Ms. Sagarika Koneru; Mr. Gudi Madhusudhan Reddy; Mr. Koushik Kanduri; Mr. Kadiyala Ravindranath; Mr. Rajeshwar Rao Garige Representing Mr. Shashank Garige; Mr. Nayakawadi Ramesh.
For the Respondents:Mr. A. Sudarshan Reddy, Learned Advocate General; Mr. A. Prabhakar Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences assisted by Mr. G. Ravi; Ms. Ande Vishala, learned counsel representing Mr. Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India;

ORDER :

Alok Aradhe, C.J.

In this batch of writ petitions, the issue with regard to validity of Rule 3(a) of the Telangana Medical and Dental Colleges Admission (Admission into MBBS & BDS Courses) Rules, 2017 (hereafter referred to as ‘2017 Rules’) as amended vide G.O.Ms.No.33, dated 19.07.2024, arises for consideration. The petitioners in this bunch of writ petitions claim to be permanent residents of the State of Telangana and seek a direction to treat them as local candidates for admission into MBBS and BDS Courses in the State of Telangana. Briefly stated the facts in different writ petitions are as under:

(I) FACTS

W.P.No.21910 of 2024:

2. The petitioner Nos.1 to 3 and 6 to 14, as per the averments made in the writ petition, have studied in the State of Telangana all through. The aforesaid petitioners shifted to State of Andhra Pradesh as the institute therein was offering coaching for NEET examination exclusively. The petitioners have passed the Intermediate examination from the State of Andhra Pradesh. The petitioner No.4 has studied grades I to IV in Singapore, whereas grades V to X in the State of Telangana. The petitioner No.4 had to shift to Dubai due to her father’s ill heal

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                whatsapp-icon Back to top