Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA
Ravi Prasad Kadiyala – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the cases (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. parties' arguments and contentions (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. criteria for granting pre-arrest bail (Para 17 , 28) |
| 4. allegations of criminal activity and trespassing (Para 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. court's orders on bail applications (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
ORDER :
A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J.
Crl.P.Nos.5730, 5860 and 5861 of 2025
The complainant party in Cr.No.244 of 2025 is Santhi Ashramam people and the complainant party in Cr.No.245 of 2025 are from Gajula family. The civil litigation between the parties went up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court, covered by SLP.No.27400 of 2023.
2. On the allegation against Gajula family people that they attempted to trespass and dispossess the Santhi Ashramam people from the property handed over in terms of the orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and that there was attempt of lives on one K.Raviprasad/informant and others belonging to Santhi Ashramam people, by engaging rowdy elements etc., the case in Cr.No.244 of 2025 is registered.
3. On the allegation against Santhi Ashramam people that they tried to dispossess and eliminate Gajula Goutam/informant and others with the aid of rowdy ele
The court highlighted that anticipatory bail applications must evaluate the gravity of allegations, the role of the accused, and ensure fairness in the investigative process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the avoidance of multiplicity of litigation and the need to abide by the final outcome of the civil suit in the context of applying Section 145 Cr.....
Successive bail applications require substantial change in circumstances; prior denials must be respected to prevent judicial abuse.
The judgment established the need for a prima facie case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and emphasized caution in granting anticipatory bail und....
The jurisdiction for anticipatory bail in caste atrocity cases is reserved for special courts under the Scheduled Castes Act, reaffirming the necessity for prima facie evidence for jurisdictional app....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principles of abuse of process of law and mala fide intentions in filing a complaint, as outlined in State Haryana Versus Bh....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
