SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 960

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
V.R.K. KRUPA SAGAR, J.
Chalivendra Ramakrishna Salivendra Ramakrishna Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Petition Nos.5197, 4896, 5230, 5256, 5367, 5475, 5487, 5503, 5550, 5553, 5585, 5652, 5718, 5724, 5752, 5839, 5920 and 9083 of 2024
Decided On : 06-01-2025 

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : HARINADH NIDAMANURI
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The jurisdiction for anticipatory bail in caste atrocity cases is reserved for special courts under the Scheduled Castes Act, reaffirming the necessity for prima facie evidence for jurisdictional applicability.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - Sections 143, 147, 148, 435, 506, 436, 450, 452, 120B of IPC - Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Correct procedure and jurisdiction for anticipatory bail petitions - Court ruled that jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail under Section 482 remains subject to the special provisions of the Act, 1989. (Paras 48-56)

(B) Offences under the Act, 1989 - Court clarified the effect of Sections 18 and 18A of the Act regarding anticipatory bail, finding that if prima facie materials are not present, courts can consider such bail. (Paras 51-55)

(C) Court cautioned against using anticipatory bail mechanisms as a shield against politically charged accusations, reaffirming procedural integrity in adjudicating bail applications under the BNSS. (Paras 46, 62)

Facts of the case:
The petitions sought anticipatory bail for multiple accused in a politically charged case where caste-based and other serious allegations were made against them, with claims of political motivations. The incident involved physical attacks on a political party office, leading to various criminal charges. (Paras 38-44)

Findings of Court:
The court dismissed all anticipatory bail petitions, stating that the jurisdiction for granting them falls under special courts per the Act, with no concurrent original jurisdiction for high courts, necessitating appeals post-decision. (Paras 60-62)

Issues: The court addressed whether anticipatory bail petitions were maintainable in light of the jurisdictional constraints imposed by the Scheduled Castes Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court confirmed that the special courts have exclusive jurisdiction to decide anticipatory bail petitions under the Act. The bar on anticipatory bail in cases involving the Act applies if prima facie materials are present showing offences committed.

Result: All petitions dismissed, with clarification for future applications.

Table of Content
1. chronology of events leading to bail applications. (Para 1 , 37 , 38 , 39)
2. description of the alleged crime incident. (Para 40 , 41 , 42)
3. ongoing investigation and evidence collected. (Para 43 , 44)
4. petitioners' contentions regarding delays and allegations. (Para 45 , 46)
5. jurisdictional issues concerning anticipatory bail. (Para 48 , 51 , 56)
6. final dismissal of bail applications with direction for judicial consideration. (Para 62)

ORDER :

Crl.P.No.5197 of 2024 This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS ), has been filed by the petitioner/A32 seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.137 of 2023 of Gannavaram Urban Police Station, Krishna District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 435, 506 read with 149 I.P.C and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Thereafter, the police, on the strength of the material collected, altered the provision of law into Sections 436 , 450, 452 and 120B of I.P.C and Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

2. Sri N. Harinadh, learned Counsel for petitioner and Sri Siddarth Luthra, learned Senior Counsel and Sri M.Lakshmi Narayana, learned Public Prosecutor and Sri A.Sai Rohit, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent-State submitted arguments and cited legal authorities.

Crl.P.No.4896 of 2024

3. This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS ), has been filed by the petitioner/A46 seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.137 of 2023 of Gannavaram Urban Police Station, Krishna District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 435, 506 read with 149 I.P.C and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Thereafter, the police, on the strength of the material collected, altered the provision of law into Sections 436 , 450, 452 and 120B of I.P.C and Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

4. Sri Mukkamalla Rama Swamy, the learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Siddarth Luthra, learned Senior Counsel and Sri Rohit, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent-State submitted arguments and cited legal authorities.

Crl.P.No.5230 of 2024

5. This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS ), has been filed by the petitioners/A35 and A51 seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.137 of 2023 of Gannavaram Urban Police Station, Krishna District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 435, 506 read with 149 I.P.C and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Thereafter, the police, on the strength of the material collected, altered the provision of law into Sections 436 , 450, 452 and 120B of I.P.C and Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

6. Sri Kiran Tirumalasetti, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Siddarth Luthra, learned Senior Counsel and Sri Rohit, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent-State submitted arguments and cited legal authorities.

Crl.P.No.5256 of 2024

7. This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS ), has been filed by the petitioner/A43 seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.137 of 2023 of Gannavaram Urban Police Station, Krishna District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 435, 506 read with 149 I.P.C and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Thereafter, the police, on the strength of the material collected, altered the provision of law

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top