IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
Chaitanya, W/O Yemeni Swaroop Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Ap, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Law And Justice – Respondent
ORDER :
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J.
-
Heard Sri P.A. Seshu, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri P.V.Venkata Ravi Sankar, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner (in W.P.No.21413 of 2025), Sri Thandava Yogesh, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner (in W.P.No.21494 of 2025), and Sri A. Srikanth Reddy, Ld. Government Pleader for Law & Legislative Affairs.
2. These two Writ Petitions involve similar facts and similar legal issues. Therefore, both the cases are heard together and are disposed of by this Common Order.
3. For the sake of convenience, this Court would rely on the facts mentioned in the Affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition in W.P.No.21413 of 2025. W.P.No.21413 of 2025:
4. The Writ Petitioner herein, who is a practicing Advocate was appointed as Assistant Government Pleader in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada, NTR District for a period of three years vide G.O.Rt.No.116 Law (G) Department, dated 12.03.2024 (Ex.P.2). The said appointment is made subject to the conditions of service in accordance with the Instructions issued in G.O.Ms.No.187, Law (L) Department, dated 06.12.2000 (Ex.P.3). The said appointment has been made basing on the recommend
Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Battarusetti Chenna Kesawarao
Pushpinder Kaur Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.
State of U.P and another Vs. Johri Mal
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others Vs. Ajay Kumar Sharma and another
Rakesh Kumar Singh Vs. Committee of Management Vs. Committee of Management, Rae Bareili
Engagement of Advocates as Law Officers is a professional arrangement, not subject to Writ Jurisdiction under Articles 14 and 16, affirming the Government's discretion to appoint and terminate withou....
The court established that Law Officers serve under a contractual relationship with the government, which has the discretion to terminate their services without cause.
The District Government Counsel do not hold civil posts or employee status under Article 311; their engagement is contractual, terminable at will without notice, and does not attract constitutional p....
The government holds discretion to terminate appointments of Public Prosecutors without inquiry or specific reasons, provided procedural mandates of applicable instructions are adhered to, maintainin....
The appointment to the posts of District Government Counsel (Criminal) and Assistant District Government Counsel (Criminal) by the State Government is a professional engagement of an advocate and not....
The court ruled that the appointment of Additional Advocate Generals is a professional engagement, not subject to employment laws, and the petitioner's claims lacked merit.
The doctrine of pleasure does not permit arbitrary or capricious exercise of power by the State, and such actions must comply with principles of fairness and Article 14 of the Constitution.
An advocate ceases to practice when engaged in full-time employment, rendering them ineligible for judicial recruitment under Article 233(2) of the Constitution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.