IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J.
Ch Chaitanya, W/O Yemeni Swaroop Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Ap, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Law And Justice And Ors. – Respondents
W.P.No.21413, 21494 of 2025
Decided On : 18-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disengagement of law officers. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. grounds for challenging disengagement. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. maintainability of writ petitions. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. professional engagement and rights. (Para 21 , 23) |
| 5. dismissal of writ petition. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
ORDER :
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J.
-
Heard Sri P.A. Seshu, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri P.V.Venkata Ravi Sankar, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner (in W.P.No.21413 of 2025), Sri Thandava Yogesh, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner (in W.P.No.21494 of 2025), and Sri A. Srikanth Reddy, Ld. Government Pleader for Law & Legislative Affairs.
2. These two Writ Petitions involve similar facts and similar legal issues. Therefore, both the cases are heard together and are disposed of by this Common Order.
3. For the sake of convenience, this Court would rely on the facts mentioned in the Affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition in W.P.No.21413 of 2025. W.P.No.21413 of 2025:
4. The Writ Petitioner herein, who is a practicing Advocate was appointed as Assistant Government Pleader in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada, NTR District for a period of three years vide G.O.Rt.No.116 Law (G) Department, dated 12.03.2024 (Ex.P.2). The said appointment is made subject to the conditions of service in accordance with the Instructions issued in G.O.Ms.No.187, Law (L) Department, dated 06.12.2000 (Ex.P.3). The said appointment has been made basing on the recommendation of the District Collector, NTR District (Respondent No.3) through the Letter dated 22.11.2023 to the Secretary, Law and Legislative Affairs& Justice, Department of Law, Government of Andhra Pradesh (Respondent No.2).
5. Vide impugned Proceeding bearing G.O.Rt.No.251, dated 31.07.2025 (Ex.P.1), the Writ Petitioner was disengaged from his services as Assistant Government Pleader in the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada. A further direction was also given in the impugned Order (Ex.P.1) to the District Collector, NTR District to make interim arrangement for the vacated post by appointing a Law Officer from a nearby Court as in- charge and to further submit a panel of candidates at the earliest in accordance with the ‘Instructions’ issued by the Government in G.O.Ms. No.187 Law (L) Department, dated 06.12.2000 (Ex.P.3). The Impugned Order would also indicate that the District Collector was directed to pay one month salary in lieu of one month Notice for his disengagement in accordance with Instruction No.9 of the G.O.Ms. No.187 Law (L) Department, dated 06.12.2000 (Ex.P.3).
W.P.No.21494 of 2025:
6. The Writ Petitioner herein who is a practicing Advocate was appointed as Additional Government Pleader in the Court of Additional District Judge’s Court, Vijayawada, NTR District for a period of three years vide G.O.Rt.No.115 Law (G) Department, dated 12.03.2024 (Ex.P.2). The said appointment is made subject to the conditions of service in accordance with the Instructions issued in G.O.Ms.No.187, Law (L) Department, dated 06.12.2000 (Ex.P.3). The said appointment has been made basing on the recommendation of the District Collector, NTR District (Respondent No.2) through the Letter dated 16.11.2023 to the Secretary, Law and Legislative Affairs & Justice, Department of Law, Government of Andhra Pradesh.
-
7. Vide impugned Proceeding bearing G.O.Rt.No.250, dated 31.07.2025 (Ex.P.1), the Writ Petitioner was disengaged from his services as Additional Government Pleader in the Court of the Additional District Judge’s Court, Vijayawada, NTR District. A further direction was also given in the impugned Order (Ex.P.1) to the District Collector, NTR District to make interim arrangement for the vacated post by appointing a Law Officer from a nearby Court as in-charge and to further submit a panel of candidates at the earliest in accordance with the ‘Instructions’ issued by the Government in G.O.Ms. No.187 Law (L) Department, dated 06.12.2000 (Ex.P.3). The Impugned Order would a
Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Battarusetti Chenna Kesawarao
Pushpinder Kaur Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.
State of U.P and another Vs. Johri Mal
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others Vs. Ajay Kumar Sharma and another
Rakesh Kumar Singh Vs. Committee of Management Vs. Committee of Management, Rae Bareili
Engagement of Advocates as Law Officers is a professional arrangement, not subject to Writ Jurisdiction under Articles 14 and 16, affirming the Government's discretion to appoint and terminate withou....
The District Government Counsel do not hold civil posts or employee status under Article 311; their engagement is contractual, terminable at will without notice, and does not attract constitutional p....
The government holds discretion to terminate appointments of Public Prosecutors without inquiry or specific reasons, provided procedural mandates of applicable instructions are adhered to, maintainin....
: action of the State, thus, must be judged with extreme care and circumspection. It must be borne in mind that the right of the public prosecutor or the district counsel do not flow under a statute.....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.