Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Pendyala Sita Rama Anjaneyulu Ips – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA J.
1. These Criminal Petitions are filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C.”) r/w. 480 & 483 of BNSS , 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on regular bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.56 of 2025, Suryaraopeta Police Station, NTR District.
2. Though separate applications have been filed for grant of bail by both the accused, A-1 & A-2, this Court having regard to the fact that the issue involved is common, deems it appropriate to dispose of both the criminal petitions by way of a common order.
3. The petitioners are arrayed as accused, A-1 & A-2 in FIR No.56 of 2025.
4. The brief facts of the case are that based on a complaint made by Sri P. Raja Babu, IAS against the petitioner and A-2, the subject crime was registered. The allegations are that the petitioner A-1, in Crl.P. No.5701 of 2025, while functioning as Secretary of the A.P. Public Service Commission (for short APPSC), during the relevant period, entrusted evaluation of the Answer Scripts to a private entity, represented by A-2. Thus an investigation was sought into the issue as to what exactly M/s. Camsign Media Private Limited, under
Allegations of criminal breach of trust against public servants require clear establishment of legal elements; both cheating and breach of trust cannot coexist under the same circumstances.
The court grants bail based on the review of procedural violations and the health condition of the accused, emphasizing the need for due consideration of all circumstances surrounding bail applicatio....
The prosecution must provide concrete evidence to prove allegations of criminal breach of trust; absence of critical documentation undermines a conviction under Section 409 IPC.
The court held that allegations of misappropriation and abuse of power by a public servant warrant investigation, and an FIR should not be quashed if it discloses a prima facie case.
The High Court established that criminal proceedings cannot be pursued for matters fundamentally rooted in civil disputes, reinforcing the principle against abusing the legal system.
The court established that serious allegations of criminal breach of trust and conspiracy justify proceeding to trial, and that prior sanction for prosecution is not required for a retired public ser....
Both cheating and criminal breach of trust cannot coexist under the same factual scenario due to their distinct legal requirements.
An error in the charge framed by the trial court under Section 212 of the CrPC will not be regarded as material unless it misleads the accused or occasions a failure of justice.
Anticipatory bail granted due to insufficient evidence of petitioner's direct involvement in alleged economic offences, emphasizing the necessity of proving criminal intent.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
