Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
K.SREENIVASA REDDY
Pamidikalva Madhusudhan S/o Chenchu Subbaiah (Late) – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Public Prosecutor Police Department, High Court of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J.
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘the BNSS ’) has been filed on behalf of the petitioner/accused No.2 to grant regular bail to the petitioner/accused No.2 in Crime No.56 of 2025 of Suryaraopet Police Station, Vijayawada city, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409 , 420, 477A, 120B read with 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (for brevity ‘IPC’).
2. The detailed case facts that are emanated from out of the investigation conducted by the Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Vijayawada (hereinafter referred to, as ‘APPSC’) are as follows:
(a) The APPSC issued a Notification for filling up of 169 posts in various Group-I Services vide Notification No.27/2018, dated 31.12.2018 and the selection process comprises preliminary examination, main/written examination and oral test/interview. In total, 1,14,473 candidates applied pursuant to the said Notification and preliminary examination was conducted on 26.05.2019, and 59,200 candidates appeared for the preliminary examination. Results of the preliminary examination were announced on 01.11.2019, wherein 8
The court grants bail based on the review of procedural violations and the health condition of the accused, emphasizing the need for due consideration of all circumstances surrounding bail applicatio....
Point of Law : It is well established law that scope of interference in an appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act against Interlocutory order, where rights of parties are not substantiall....
Allegations of criminal breach of trust against public servants require clear establishment of legal elements; both cheating and breach of trust cannot coexist under the same circumstances.
Point of law: Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India this Court has the power to grant orders not merely for enforcing a fundamental rights but for any “other purpose” also.
The court held that procedural discrepancies and allegations, without substantial evidence of bias or systemic failure, do not merit interference with the integrity of the examination process.
The evaluation process for public recruitment must strictly adhere to judicial directives and integrity principles, prohibiting inclusion of candidates who tampered with exam answer sheets.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of prima facie evidence, the impact of the alleged offences on society, and the ongoing investigation in determining the rejection....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
