SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 951

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ., R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
Srinivasa Educational Academy and Others - Petitioners
 Versus 
The State Of AP and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 4484 of 2019 along with W.P. Nos.2212, 5949, 6748, 7619 of 2019 & 22536 of 2024
Decided On : 26-05-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. P. Sri Raghu Ram, Senior Counsel, appearing vice Mr. Patanjali Pamidighantam.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vivek Chandra Sekhar S, for NMC; Mrs. S. Pranathi, Special Government Pleader.

An Essentiality Certificate for establishing a medical college can only be revoked by the State under clear conditions of fraud or if the foundational requirements for its issuance no longer exist.

Headnote:(A) Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 10A, 33 - National Medical Commission Act, 2019 - Essentiality Certificate for establishing medical colleges - Cancellation of Certificate by State Government challenged - Court reiterated that such cancellation may be valid only in cases of fraud or if the substratum for issuing such certificate has vanished. - The Essentiality Certificate was annulled by the State upon findings of significant deficiencies in faculty and infrastructure, leading to a decision deemed influenced by external pressure from regulatory authorities. (Paras 17, 41, 63)

(B) Quasi-judicial function - Quasi-judicial nature of the issuance of Essentiality Certificate discussed, asserting that any withdrawal should similarly adhere to due process. - The decision to cancel the certificate must originate from the proper exercise of discretion by the State Government without external dictation. (Para 41)

Facts of the case:
This writ petition challenges the cancellation of the Essentiality Certificate for establishing a medical college by the petitioner. The certificate had been issued citing the need for qualified medical personnel, but was revoked due to perceived deficiencies in infrastructure and faculty, as highlighted in various inspections conducted by regulatory authorities.

Findings of Court:
The cancellation of the Essentiality Certificate on grounds of inadequacies, while vacated, allows the State to reassess the situation on the merits, provided the process adheres to necessary legal standards and independent judgment.

Issues: The main issues addressed include whether the State has the power to revoke an Essentiality Certificate once granted, and the legal implications around its continued validity given external pressures from medical regulatory bodies.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the State government's authority to cancel the Essentiality Certificate must not stem from external pressuring but from a genuine reassessment of compliance with regulatory requirements, emphasizing that factors influencing the educational institution's performance should be critically assessed.

Result: W.P. No. 4484 of 2019 is allowed; the order canceling the Essentiality Certificate is quashed, with other petitions rendered academic or infructuous.

JUDGMENT :

DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ.

W.P. No.4484 of 2019 has been filed challenging the action of the Government in cancelling the Essentiality Certificate, which was issued on 30.09.2013, in favour of the petitioner for establishment of a medical college in the name and style of 'RVS Institute of Medical Sciences' in Chittoor District, by its order, dated 27.03.2019.

W.P. No. 2212 of 2019 has been filed challenging the letter, dated 05.02.2019, issued by the Special Chief Secretary, wherein the petitioner was called upon to show cause as to why the Essentiality Certificate should not be cancelled.

W.P. No. 7619 of 2019 has been filed challenging the proceedings, dated 20.05.2019, issued by the Board of Governors (in supersession of MCI) treating the petitioner institution as a closed medical college and requesting further action, as arbitrary, illegal.

W.P. No. 6748 of 2019 has been filed challenging the letter, dated 08.05.2019, issued by the Medical Council of India (for short, “MCI”), rejecting the petitioners' request for annual inspection of their Medical College, as arbitrary and illegal.

W.P. No. 5949 of 2019 has been filed challenging the condition imposed in proceedings, dated 03.12.2018, issued by MCI, making withdrawal of the Essentiality Certificate a prerequisite for adjusting students.

Aggrieved of the orders passed in appeal upholding the order of disapproval, dated 04.07.2024, recorded by the National Medical Commission (for short, “NMC”), writ petition bearing No. 22536 of 2024 has been filed.

2. The regulation of medical education in the country was earlier governed by the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). However, with effect from 26.09.2018, the Board of Governors was appointed in supersession of the MCI. Subsequently, after coming into effect of the NMC Act, 2019, on 25.09.2020, the NMC replaced the Board of Governors as the Apex regulatory body.

3. The Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, inter alia deals with the issue of establishment of a new medical college. Regulations have been framed in terms of Section 10A r/w Section 33 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, and are called “the Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999”.

4. Section 10A of the Act inter alia envisages that no person shall establish a medical college except with the previous permission of the Central Government. Section 10A(2) of the Act envisages that for purposes of obtaining permission under Section 10A(1), a scheme shall have to be submitted to the Central Government and that the Central Government shall refer the scheme to the council for its recommendations. The scheme to be submitted to the Government has to be submitted in a prescribed form i.e., Form-I, as per regulations, which have been framed in accordance with the powers conferred under Section 10A r/w 33 of the Act.

According to the regulations, in particular, regulation No.3, an Essentiality Certificate in Form-2 is required reflecting no objection of the State Government/Union Territory for establishment of the proposed medical college at the proposed site.

For purposes of clarity, regulation 3 of 1999 is reproduced hereunder:

“3. The establishment of a medical college – No person shall establish a medical college except after obtaining prior permission from the Central Government by submitting a Scheme annexed with these regulations.”

5. It appears from the record that the Essentiality Certificate was issued in favour of the petitioner. The contents whereof read as under:

Sl.No.State Figures
PrivateGovernment
1No. of institutions already/existing in the State2614
2No. of seats available or No. of doctors being produced35502050
3No. of doctors registered with the State64718
4No. of doctors in Government service13,015
5No. of Government posts vacant and those in rural / difficult areas1987
6No, of doctors registered with Employment exchangeNot available
7Doctor population ratio in the State60: 1 lakh
8How the establishment of the college would

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top