Back
V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Settipalli Raghurami Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
V.R.K. Krupa Sagar, J.
1. This criminal petition under section 438 of the CrPC is filed by the petitioner/A1 to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.67 of 2024 of Chapadu Police Station of YSR Kadapa District for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 324, 307 read with 149 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v) of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015.
2. Heard arguments of Sri T.Niranjan Reddy, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of Sri T.Nagarjuna Reddy, the learned counsel for petitioner/A1, Sri Venkat Challa, the learned counsel for respondent No.2 and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State.
Petitioner is innocent and did not participate in the alleged crime incident.
Out of political reasons, petitioner is implicated.
Facts do not make out a case for applying any of the penal provisions alleged.
In terms of law laid down by the courts application for anticipatory bail is maintainable.
For respondents, it is argued
This petitioner is the leader and other accused are his followers.
There is misuse of political power and the attempt was to harm the opposition.
Since it is a ca
Anticipatory bail can be granted if no prima facie case of caste atrocity is established, despite the restrictions under the SC and ST Act.
(1) Anticipatory bail – Registering a petition is purely administrative in nature and applicability or otherwise of interdict of law require judicial application of mind and judicial standards and su....
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail under the SC/ST Act, necessitating an appeal against the Special Court's decision if bail is denied.
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail under the SC/ST Act when a prima facie case exists, as remedies lie in appealing the Special Court's decision.
Anticipatory bail applications under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act must be filed in Special Courts, not the High Court, as per Section 14A.
Anticipatory bail petitions under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 are not maintainable unless prima facie evidence exists, as per Sections 18 and 18....
The court ruled that anticipatory bail cannot be granted in cases involving allegations under the SC/ST Act, as per Section 14A, which bars such petitions.
The jurisdiction for anticipatory bail in caste atrocity cases is reserved for special courts under the Scheduled Castes Act, reaffirming the necessity for prima facie evidence for jurisdictional app....
(1) Atrocities Act, 1989 – Public view – to attract Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) as well as 3(2)(va) as alleged by the prosecution, intention on the part of the accused persons to intimate with intent to....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
