Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
T.Mallikarjuna Rao
P.V. Midhun Reddy @ Peddireddi Venkata Midhun Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
T. Mallikarjuna Rao, J.
1. This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to direct the respondents to examine the petitioner in connection with Crime No.21 of 2024 of CID Police Station, Mangalagiri, Guntur District in the presence of an advocate of his choice and further record the same through audio-video electronic means and pass such other order.
2. As reflected in the notice dated 16.04.2025, which is annexed to the Writ Petition, the petitioner has been directed to appear before the SIT at the Office of the Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada, on 19.04.2025 at 10:00 hours, for the purpose of investigation. As evident from the record, the petitioner has been elected as a Member of Parliament representing the Rajampet Constituency. It is submitted by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner that the ruling party, driven by political vendetta, has targeted the petitioner with an intention to implicate him in the present case. However, as per the available record, the petitioner has not been arrayed as an accused. Upon inquiry by this Court, the learned Advocate General informed that CCTV cameras have been duly installed within the Office of the Commiss
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
