Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Balina Srimannarayana – Appellant
Versus
Srr Hospitalities Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for damages and court's decree (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. application for review of judgment (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. grounds and standards for review (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. analysis of findings and evidence in review (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. conclusion on validity of review application (Para 20) |
ORDER :
1. The 1st respondent who is plaintiff filed suit claiming an amount of Rs. 13,45,17,354 towards compensation and for amounts invested for installation, damages and for mandatory injunction directing the 1st defendant in the suit to provide bore well water, municipal water, lifts facility, ground water tanks, and to remove obstructions to septic tanks, shops let out on stair case to remove from on generator to keys of the shutters and to lift garbage to remove constructions in parking area in cellar portion for ingress and ages to get NOC/occupancy certificate from Ongole Municipal Corporation and fire department and to obtain legal enforceable documents form 2nd respondent/2nd defendant in pursuance of agreement dated 02.05.2006 vide suit O.S.No.284 of 2014 on the file of VIII Additional District Judge, Prakasham at Ongole.
2. The said suit was
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
