Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
N. Govinda Swamy – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of mutt's history and succession. (Para 3) |
| 2. dispute over succession claims among heirs. (Para 5 , 12) |
| 3. arguments by parties regarding succession rights. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. court's conclusion on jurisdiction and required proceedings. (Para 19) |
| 5. directions provided for resolving succession claims. (Para 21) |
ORDER :
Ravi Cheemalapati, J.
Feeling aggrieved by the common order dated 03.10.2024 passed in W.P.No.29071 of 2021 & W.P.No.42248 of 2022, the petitioners in the said writ petitions preferred the intra Court appeals vide W.A.No.1066/2024 and W.A.No.3 of 2025, respectively, under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent.
2. Inasmuch as the parties in these writ appeals are common and the relief sought is interrelated, both the writ appeals are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
3. The facts that led to filing of these writ appeals, in brief, are that:
(a) ‘Sri Mad Virat Pothuluri Veera Bhrahmendra Swamy Mutt’ (herein after referred to as ‘Mutt’) was found by Sri Sri Sri Pothuluri Veerabhramendra Swamy, a celebrated social reformer and futurologist (Kalagnani), about more than 350 years ago. The main person or Guru of Mutt is popula
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
