Shaik Mahboob Subhani vs Shaik Azima

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(AP) 1593

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR
Shaik Mahboob Subhani – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Azima – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Kaushik Kumbhajadala.
For the Respondents: Subba Rao Jandhyam, Public Prosecutor (AP).

Table of Content
1. maintenance claim and ex parte order context. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5)
2. legal reasoning regarding maintenance obligations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. order dismissal and confirmation. (Para 10)

ORDER :

V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR, J.

A Muslim husband filed this Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure (‘Cr.P.C.’) impugning that part of the order of the learned trial Court which has gone against his interest.

2. Respondent No.1 is a woman who claimed maintenance before the Court below and she is stated to be the wife of the revision petitioner. Respondent No.2 is the State.

3. Heard Sri Mekala Ramamurthy, the learned counsel for revision petitioner and Sri Subba Rao Jandhyam, the learned counsel for respondent No.1.

4. A few facts are to be noticed:

Smt. Shaik Azima filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. claiming a monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000/- and for costs and other reliefs. That case was registered as M.C.No.7 of 2018. She made this claim against Sri Shaik Mahaboob Subhani, who is the revision petitioner here. On 14.10.2018 learned Judge, Family Court-cum-VIII Additional District Judge, Prakasam at Ongole disposed of the said mainte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document