Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
V.R.K.Krupa Sagar
Kalluru Narayana Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Kalluru Chenchugandla Jaya Chandra Reddy – Respondent
ORDER :
V R K Krupa Sagar, J.
Defendant No.1 filed this civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 26.07.2019 of the learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa in I.A.No.1458 of 2018 in O.S.No.752 of 2017.
2. Heard arguments of Sri Jayanti S.C. Sekhar, the learned counsel for revision petitioner and Sri Venkata Reddy Chittem, the learned counsel for respondent No.1.
3. O.S.No.752 of 2017 is a suit filed for declaration of title and for permanent injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. Plaint refers to an unregistered Will dated 14.12.1948 executed by Sri K.Chinnaiah in favour of the father of the plaintiff. That the Will came into effect on the death of the testator. Thereafter on the death of the father, plaintiff succeeded the property. The other averments in the plaint are to the effect that the plaintiff has been in possession and enjoyment of this property as he has been keeping manure heaps in it and tying his cattle and he mentions about three other people who also keep their cattle manure in the suit schedule property. It is further averred that there is also a choultry in the property. That there is a ta
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
