Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
CHALLA GUNARANJAN
Mohd. Saleemuddin – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing petition for anticipatory bail. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's assessment of evidence and allegations. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. order granting bail to petitioners. (Para 12) |
ORDER :
The present petition is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity 'the BNS S'), seeking anticipatory bail with respect to offences under Sections 318 (4), 329(3), and 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity 'the BNS ') registered under Crime No.272 of 2025 on the file of the Cyberabad Police Station, RGI Airport.
2. The petitioners herein are arraigned as A1 to A4.
3. The de facto complainant has lodged a complaint on 04.04.2025 alleging that he was induced to enter into an agreement for the purchase of property belonging to A1, for which, on 14.03.2025, he paid an amount of Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lakhs Only) in cash as token advance on the understanding that a necessary agreement would be executed. However, no such agreement has come to be executed. The de facto complainant sought a refund of the aforesaid amount. On the pretext of repaying the same, the accused
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
