Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Sree Gowari Biotech Hatchery, JH – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary to Energy Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist. A.P – Respondent
ORDER :
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J.
1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
The petitioner prays that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in levying electricity duty on its hatchery unit situated at survey No.12-2, Tenkayapalemchettupalem village, Ulavapadu Mandal, Kaderu post, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore, having LT.Sc No.4522353000489, at Rs.1 per unit instead of Rs.0-06 paisa per unit as directed by this court through its common judgment in W.P.No.29672 of 2023 and batch on 26th June, 2025 as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14 and 19 of the constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents herein to refund the excess amount levied and collected by them of than Rs.0-06 paisa per unit from the petitioner more as electricity duty in the monthly bills starting from the month of April 2024 till date together with appropriate interest as per law and pass such order or other orders as deems fit and proper in the interest of justice…”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government pleader for the respondent No.1 and
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
