Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
R. Mehraj Bee W/o S. Nowshad – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents in trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in an extent of Ac.0.02½ cents, Ac.0.02½ cents, Ac.0.02 cents and Ac.0.02½ cents respectively covered by S.No.1131-17 and 1131-19 situated in Doddipalle Village, Pileru Mandal in Annamayya District, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent officials not to interfere with the peaceful possession of subject land of the petitioner thereby securing their lawful rights and to grant any other relief deemed appropriate in the interest of justice.”
2. It is the pleading of the petitioners that a person in settled possession of immoveable property is entitled to continue in such possession, without being dispossessed save and except in accordance with law.
3. In Rame Gowda v. M. Varadappa Naidu , (2004) 1 SCC 769, a three-Judge Bench of Apex Court, while discussing the Indian law on the subject,
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
