Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
V.SUJATHA
Mutyala Maha Lakshmana Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. non-payment of contractual dues (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on entitlement and budget delay (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. precedents on non-payment issues (Para 4) |
| 4. court directive on payment timetable (Para 7) |
ORDER :
1. The present writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents not releasing the amount of Rs.10,80,663/- vide M Book No. 5749 DG, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e., O and M to Removal of Weed Growth Pala Codu Medium & its Infalling Minor Drains (in weed free condition) for the year 2023-24, vide Agreement No. 10/2023-24, dated 20.07.2023 is questioned, as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to pay for payment of amounts of Rs.10,80,663/- vide M Book No. 5749 DG with interest @24% per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work forthwith and pass such other order or orders….”
2. The petitioner had been awarded the contract of work i.e., O and
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
