Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Y.LAKSHMANA RAO
Vadde Sreenivasulu S/o.V. Jayaram – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) by the petitioner/Accused No.3 for granting of pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No.250 of 2025 of Prohibition and Excise Station, Ananthapuramu, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Section 34 (a) (1) (ii) of Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 (Amendment) Act, 2025.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.
3. As seen from the record, the allegation against the petitioner/Accused No.3 is that he along with Accused No.2 have been indulged in illegal liquor business and some antecedents were reported against the petitioner/A-3 vide a case in F.I.R.No.358 of 2024 of Prohibition and Excise Station, Ananthapuramu. The petitioner/A-3 is aged about 40 years and he is an ex-service man. The role of the petitioner has come to the light based on the confession given by the Accused No.1. There are specific overacts against the petitioner/Accused No.3.
4. In view of the specific overt acts attributed against the petitioner/ A-3, this Court is not inclined to grant pre-arrest
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
