Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Vanukuri Srikanth, Krishna DT – Appellant
Versus
V. Sri Lakshmi Vijayawada – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought maintenance due to abuse. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. respondent disputes maintenance and claims income. (Para 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court analyzed evidence for maintenance order. (Para 6 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. findings on revisional powers and maintenance. (Para 13 , 22 , 28) |
| 5. revision case dismissed; family court order upheld. (Para 29 , 30) |
ORDER :
1. The Criminal Revision Case, under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) is filed on behalf of the Petitioner/Husband, assailing the Order dated 04.04.2017 in M.C.No.144 of 2015, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, (for short ‘the Family Court’) granting maintenance amount to the 1st petitioner.
2. Respondents are the Petitioners, who filed the M.C.No.144 of 2015 seeking to direct the petitioner (respondent) to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month to the 1st Petitioner and Rs.10,000/- per month to the 2nd petitioner towards their maintenance from the date of petition.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties to this Criminal Revision Case will hereinaft
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
