Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Pampana Kalyani – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner argues the freezing of salary violates rights under constitution. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding notice and due process. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court examines the necessity and role of the financial institution. (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. legality of petition without exhausting alternatives under arbitration act. (Para 13 , 15) |
| 5. final ruling is dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 22) |
ORDER :
1. The above Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of respondent in freezing the petitioner's salary from May, 2024 onwards, in pursuance of order passed by the arbitral tribunal in ARB/PCHFL/PL/26/2024/97 dated 03.05.2024, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India.
2.......
a) The petitioner, a Government Teacher, filed the above writ petition. In the affidavit, it was averred that the petitioner has been working as a Teacher, PMSRHI ZPP Girls High School, Ganapavaram, since 2009. The monthly salary of the petitioner Rs.83,103/- is credited to her bank account No.30933722886 of State Bank of India, Gandhinagar Branch, Vijayawada. The petitioner obtained a personal loan of Rs.19.5 lakhs in December 2022, and
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
