SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(AP) 5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AT AMARAVATI
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J
V.Rabbani Basha - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj And Rural Development and others - Respondents
Writ Petition Nos. : 31871, 32835 of 2022, 30041 of 2023 & 1690 of 2024
Decided On : 05-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: VUTUPALLI RAJANNA
For the Respondent: GP, Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel

Government actions in granting licenses must align with principles of reasonableness and public interest, ensuring no arbitrary decision-making that creates monopolies.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 38, and 39 - Writ of Mandamus - The petitioner challenged the termination of his licenses and tender notification related to multiple open spaces, alleging violation of natural justice and arbitrary actions by the authorities. The court noted violations involving sub-letting and non-payment of fees. (Paras 6-9)

(B) Administrative Discretion - The government actions must conform to standards of reasonableness, non-arbitrariness, and public interest, particularly in matters of allocating public resources or licenses. (Paras 12-22)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was aggrieved by the termination of his licenses for various open spaces and argued against the tender notification that followed. The respondent claimed that the petitioner violated license conditions by sub-letting and failing to adhere to stipulated terms. (Paras 4-5)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner violated license conditions by sub-letting, leading to dismissal of the writ petition and quashing of the tender notification. (Paras 10-23)

Issues: The main issue was whether the actions taken by public authorities were arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, and whether sub-letting violated license conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the actions of the authorities were justified due to the petitioner’s breaches of the agreed terms, emphasizing the government’s duty to allocate resources equitably. (Paras 22-24)

Result: Writ Petition dismissed. Tender Notification quashed.

Table of Content
1. challenging illegal termination of licenses. (Para 4 , 5)
2. respondent's claims regarding sub-letting. (Para 6 , 7)
3. court's objective view on licensing practices. (Para 8 , 9 , 22)
4. final ruling on tender notification. (Para 10 , 23)
5. importance of articles 14, 19, 21 in state action. (Para 13 , 14)

ORDER :

Heard Sri Venkateswarlu Kolla, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners in W.P.No.1690 of 2024, 30041 of 2023, Smt. G. Urmila, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Smt. P. Vijaya Kumari, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner in W.P.No.32835 of 2022 and Sri Aravala Rama Rao, learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC.

2. The Writ Petitioner is the same person in all the four Writ Petitions. As no cause survives in W.P.Nos.31871, 32835 of 2022 & 30041 of 2023, these Writ Petitions have become infructuous.

3. The Writ Petition bearing W.P.No.1690 of 2024 is filed seeking the following relief :

“…….to issue Writ, Order or Orders more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of District Public Transport Officer (Respondent 3) in issuing termination orders of my licence dated 08-12-2023 for open space No. 03, 04 , 06 ,07, 10 and also open space No. 05 & 08 dated 15-11-2023 and also inviting fresh tenders dated 4- 1-2024 for open spaces in Erraguntla Bus Station of Kadapa, YSR District as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and against principles of natural justice offending articles 14, 19, 21 and article 300 of the Constitution of India and consequently quash or set aside the termination orders dated 8-12-2023 for open space No. 03, 04 , 06 ,07, 10 and 15-11-2023 for open space No. 05 & 08 and also the tender notification dated 4-1-2024 issued by the District Public Transport Officer Kadapa, YSR District and pass such other Order or Orders as may deem fit and necessary in the circumstances of the case”

FACTS AS PER WRIT PETITIONER:

4. The above prayer would indicate that the Writ Petitioner is aggrieved of the Termination Orders of his licences in respect of Open Space Nos.3,4,5,6, 7,8,10. The Writ Petitioner is also aggrieved of the issuance of the latest Tender Notification dated 04.01.2024 for the above mentioned Open Spaces (Ex.P.1). The above prayer would indicate that the Termination Orders were passed in the months of November and December, 2023, and thereafter, the Respondents have issued Tender Notification dated 04.01.2024. Previously, the Respondent APSRTC Kadapa Region has called for bidding of Open Spaces and issued Tender Notification dated 05.01.2022 for grant of licences for doing different kind of businesses at Yerraguntla Bus Station by fixing a monthly licence fee. The Writ Petitioner had participated in the Tender process and secured allotment letters for Open Spaces dated 31.03.2022 for Open Stall Nos.5 to 10 for the purpose of running different businesses for a period of five years. Licence fee for each of the Open Spaces was payable on monthly basis. The Writ Petitioner entered into an Agreement for running the said Open Spaces on 16.06.2022. The Writ Petitioner has also entered into an Agreement on 25.04.2023. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner that the Respondents have issued Show Cause Notices dated 10.10.2023, 2011.2023 & 24.11.2023 in respect of payment of monthly licence fee for the months of November, 2023.

5. The Writ Petitioner has filed W.P.No.28876 of 2023 challenging the said Show Cause Notices dated 10.10.2023, 2011.2023 & 24.11.2023. Vide Order dated 03.11.2023, this Court has disposed of the W.P.No.28876 of 2023 directing the Writ Petitioner to submit the explanation to the Show Cause Notices that were issued to him. Thereafter, the Writ Petitioner has received the Orders of Termination dated 15.11.2023 & 08.12.2023 immediately. Thereafter, the Respondent Corporation herein has called for Tenders on 04.01.2025 for grant of licences for the stalls/Open Spaces which were meant for different kind of businesses in the Open Stall Nos.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top