Back
ALOK ARADHE, ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
T. Harish Rao – Appellant
Versus
Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Shri Justice Anil Kumar Jukanti)
Mr. Gandra Mohan Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. G. Malla Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader attached to the office of the learned Advocate General for the State of Telangana for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Mr. Vedula Srinivas, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. S. Viplav Simha Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.4.
2. This writ petition is filed praying to grant the following relief:
The court upheld the government's policy for land allotment to promote the film industry, emphasizing compliance with Article 14 and the importance of transparency in public contracts.
The State must ensure fair and transparent policies in public property dealings, adhering to constitutional mandates, while judicial review of policy decisions is limited to cases of arbitrariness or....
Process of applying the pick and choose policy and making allotments at the whims and fancies of the persons in power continued in the State.
The court affirmed the constitutional validity of the MIDC's priority allotment policy, emphasizing that online applications and fair process must apply uniformly, without arbitrary distinctions amon....
Government actions in granting licenses must align with principles of reasonableness and public interest, ensuring no arbitrary decision-making that creates monopolies.
State actions regarding license distribution must comply with fairness, non-arbitrariness, and promote public interest by avoiding monopolies.
The court emphasized the legal principles related to the disposal of public properties, legitimate expectations, and the authority's discretion in allotment decisions.
Writ petitions can be maintained against administrative actions affecting contracts, especially when principles of natural justice and public policy are at stake.
The allotment of land and delivery of possession in favor of the petitioner is a Government Grant within the meaning of the Government Grants Act, 1895. The State is not entitled to resume the land a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
