SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(AP) 21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J.
Thota Nageswara Rao – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of AP and Others – Respondents
W.P.Nos.1909, 54, 150, 428, 557 and 753 of 2025 and 335, 406, 512, 889, 925, 1046, 921 and 1006 of 2026
Decided On : 08-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: D. V. V. S. S. N. H. Bhujanga Rao, Ashok Kondeti, K. V. L. Narasimha Rao, Rambabu Koppineedi, Boda Satya Naga Manjeet, Dasari S. V. V. S. V. Prasad, Ashok Kondeti, Srinivasa Rao Pappu, K.L.N. Swamy, Rambabu Koppineedi
For the Respondents: GP For Home, GP For Revenue, Yarraguntla Koteswara Rao, Standing Counsel.

The Government and authorities must enforce animal welfare laws effectively to prevent unlawful cockfighting, as mandated by existing judicial orders and statutory provisions.

Headnote:(A) Andhra Pradesh Animal Cruelty Prevention Act, 1960 - Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1974 - Writ petitions seeking enforcement of animal welfare laws against unlawful cockfighting activities - Directions issued to Government and authorities to establish SPCAs and enforce relevant laws by 31.01.2017, assisted by joint inspection teams, with powers under Section 144 Cr.P.C. for preventative measures - Responsibilities outlined for District Collectors and police to prevent cruelty and ensure compliance with animal welfare standards. (Paras 1-7)

(B) Court's authority on unlawful activities - Court mandates preventive measures against activities harmful to public interest, emphasizing the duty of the state to enforce laws safeguarding animal rights and welfare. (Paragraphs 3 and 5)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners sought judicial intervention due to inaction by authorities regarding unlawful cockfights leading to gambling and addiction issues, previously addressed by this Court in another public interest case. The Government acknowledged ongoing educational measures for public awareness.

Findings of Court:
The Court directed the establishment of SPCAs and the immediate formation of joint inspection teams to monitor and prevent unlawful cockfighting activities, ensuring proper enforcement of existing laws and upholding animal welfare.

Issues: The primary issues involve the enforcement of existing animal welfare legislation and the effectiveness of state responses to unlawful cockfighting activities.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the Government and local authorities hold a duty to actively implement laws against unlawful activities like cockfights, citing obligations under previous judicial directions and mandates, to ensure animal welfare and public interest protection.

Result: Writ petitions disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and petitioners (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments against cockfighting and state response (Para 3 , 4)
3. guidelines issued by the court regarding enforcement (Para 5)

ORDER :

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J.

Since all the writ petitions have been filed seeking the same relief, they are being heard and disposed of through this common order.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners in all the writ petitions and Smt.A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners made representations to the respondent authorities to stop cockfights, as they involve betting and other unlawful activities that attract youth, lead to addiction to alcohol, and result in the loss of their properties. However, no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel further submits that the Division Bench of this Court has already addressed this issue and issued directions to the respondent authorities in W.P.(PIL) No. 177 of 2016, dated 16.09.2019. Learned counsel finally prays this Court that let there be a direction to the respondent authorities to take appropriate steps over the matters.

4. Learned Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that police are taking steps to educate the people not to indulge in such unlawful activities and further would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders.

5. Considering the submissions made and in view of the directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(PIL).No.177 of 2016 dated 16.09.2019, these writ petitions are disposed of with the following guidelines.

1. As mandated by the 2001 Rules, and the orders of the Supreme Court in Geeta Seshmani v. Union of India (W.P. (Civil) No(s). 440 of 2000 dated 06.08.2008 and Gauri Maulekhi v. Union of India : W.P. (Civil) No. 881 of 2014 dated 13.07.2015, the Government of A.P. shall, at the earliest and in any event not later than 31.01.2017, constitute SPCAs in all District of the State of Andhra Pradesh strictly in accordance with the 2001 Rules.

2. The District Collectors of all the Districts, more particularly of West Godavari, East Godavari, Krishna and Guntur, shall constitute joint inspection teams, for each mandal in their respective Districts consisting of a police officer not below the rank of Sub-Inspector of Police, the Tahsildar, and a representative of either the animal Welfare Board of India or a member of a non-govermental organization espousing the cause of animals or persons involved in the prevention of cruelty to animals. Two police constables, and a photographer, shall assist each of these inspection teams which shall be constituted on or before 07.01.2017. These joint inspection teams shall be provided necessary assistance by the District Administration to tour all villages in their Mandal, and identify playgrounds/cock-pits where such events are proposed to be held.

3. The District Collector/ the Commissioners of Police/Superintendent of Police of the District, on being informed of the places where such playgrounds and cockpits have been formed, shall take immediate action to ensure that such playgrounds are not utilized for conducting cock-fights, if need be, by exercising powers under Section 144 Cr.P.C.

4. They shall also be entitled to seize instruments used or intended to be used for the cock fights, and any money which may have been collected towards betting at such events.

5. All the District Collectors, the Commissioners of Police and the Superintendent of Police, more particularly from these four District, shall ensure effective implementation of the provisions of the 1960 and the 1974 Acts. They shall be held personally responsible for lapses, if any, on their part in ensuring its proper and effective implementation during the ensuing Sankranthi festivals.

6. The District Collectors and the Superintendents of Police may, if need be, organise village level meetings to inform the general pub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top