Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, T.C.D.SEKHAR
Ushabala Chits Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of State Tax – Respondent
ORDER :
R. Raghunandan Rao, J.
The petitioner is a chit fund company engaged in the business of running chit schemes. The conduct of chits is regulated by the Chit Fund Act, 1982 [for short “the Act 1982”] read with the Andhra Pradesh Chit Funds Rules, 2008 [for short “the Rules 2008”]. The method of conduct of chits, as regulated by the said Act, 1982 and the Rules, 2008, has been set out by the petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition. The same is being extracted below:-
“A person (known as Foreman) gathers (enrols) a group of chit subscribers, say 40 members (subscribers), who are willing to pay, say Rs.2,500/- per month, say for a period of 40 months (the number of subscribers in a group and the number of months of the chit group, chit period, is normally the same). For gathering chit subscribers, collecting money from each subscriber, conducting monthly chit auctions (to identify the one subscriber who is entitled to the chit (prized) amount) and disbursing the prized amount, the Foreman is entitled to collect a Foreman commission at 5% of the chit value as per Section 21 (1)(b) of the Chit Funds Act, 1982. In the above example, the Foreman would be able
Interest and penalties for delayed subscription payments in chit funds are not subject to GST, as they do not qualify as service fees under the Chit Fund Act and associated rules.
Interest collected by chit foremen from defaulting subscribers is not subject to GST as it does not represent consideration for supply of services.
Power of National Commission to review under Section 21 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is limited to cases where some prima facie error appears in impugned order.
Consumer forums have jurisdiction in disputes involving chit fund operators, and failure to fulfill obligations pertains to deficiency of service under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.
Bar contained in sub-section (3) of Section 64 of the Chit Funds Act has no application to any suit or other proceedings filed before the civil court, in respect of dispute relating to any chit start....
A chit subscriber incurs a debt upon prizing a chit, enabling the creation of an equitable mortgage for securing future obligations, contrary to the trial court's dismissal on grounds of limitation.
A plaintiff cannot file a suit against an unregistered chit fund for recovery of money, highlighting the necessity of a valid Board resolution for instituting a suit on behalf of a company.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
