SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1182

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B Krishna Mohan, J.
S. Padmangabutchamani W/O. S.Venkateswararao - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary(Revenue) And Ors. - Respondents
W.P.No.13820 of 2020 and W.P.No.13447 of 2020
Decided On : 20-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P Sri Ram
For the Respondent:Addl Advocate General (Ap), GP For Registration And Stamps (Ap)

Orders issued under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act against deceased individuals are void, and the repeal of the Act removes restrictions on the land in question.

Headnote:(A) Registration Act, 1908 - Section 22A(1)(d) - Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 - Writ petitions challenging refusal to register property documents based on notifications declaring land as ULC - Petitioner's vendors not receiving notices under ULC Act, thus proceedings were void. (Paras 3, 10, 18)

(B) Land Law - ULC proceedings against deceased declarants rendered orders void due to lack of proper notices and failure to pass requisite orders under ULC Act - ULC Repeal Act, 1999 reclassifies subject land. (Paras 11, 16)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought registration of property documents for land in Yendada Village, which was denied on grounds of being ULC land, despite claims of proper ownership and lack of valid proceedings affecting their title.

Findings of Court:
The court permitted the petitioners to apply for deletion from the prohibited land list with the authority to reconsider registration requests, emphasizing adherence to legal procedure.

Issues: Whether the subject land is rightly categorized as ULC land and if proper procedures were followed in issuance of notifications.

Ratio Decidendi: Orders issued under ULC against deceased individuals are void ab initio; the ULC Act's repeal implies that any standing restrictions on the subject land are lifted.

Result: Writ petitions disposed of with directions for reconsideration of applications.

ORDER :

B Krishna Mohan, J.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. This writ petition was filed questioning the intimation letter dated 10.12.2018 of the 4th respondent refusing to register the Document P.No.295 of 2018 as Registration No.28 of 2018 and Document P.No.296 of 2018 as Registration No.29 of 2018 presented for registration by the petitioner in respect of her property to an extent of 360 Sq. yards situated in Plot No.2 and 350 Sq. yards situated in Plot No.7 covered by Sy. Nos.101/1, 101/2, 101/3, 101/4 & 101/5 of Yendada Village of Yendada Gram Panchayat, Vishakhapatnam Rural and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District on the ground that it is notified under section 22A(1)(d) of the Registration Act, 1908 including the ULC proceedings of the Respondent No.5 in C.C. Nos.4324/76 and 4323/76 which resulted in the issuance of the impugned intimation by the Respondent No.4.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 4th respondent issued the impugned intimations dated 10.12.2018 when two gift deeds were presented by the petitioner for registrations on 13.03.2018 by keeping them pending as P.No.295/2018 & P.No.296/2018 and refused to register them as No.28/2018 and 29/2018, dated 10.12.2018 with a further request to prefer an appeal before the District Registrar, Visakhapatnam under section 72(1) of the Registration Act, 1908 within 30 days from the date of the order. The said impugned intimations dated 10.12.2018 were issued on the ground that the said survey number is notified as prohibited under section 22A(1)(d) of the Registration Act, 1908 treating it as ULC land.

4. He also refers to the proceedings of the 5th respondent in C.C.No.7229/1983 dated 28.02.1983 addressed to the declarants by names Nammi Chandraiah, Nammi Appanna and Duvvi Ramulu. According to it, the declarants filed a statement in Form-I u/s.6(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 and the enquiry reveals that the declarant holds the properties mentioned in the statement appended and it was held that the declarant’s lands are agricultural lands situated within the Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation limits and they are not attracted by the provisions of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 as long as they are used for agricultural purposes only. The appendix of the said proceedings contains the survey Nos.101/1, 101/2, 101/3, 101/4 & 101/5 with extents Ac.0.95 cents, Ac.0.22 cents, Ac.0.34 cents, Ac.0.20 cents and Ac.0.50 cents respectively with the remarks column as detailed in the said proceedings.

5. He also refers to the sale deed executed by Nammi Chandraiah, Nammi Gangaiah, Nammi Apparao, Nammi Ramulu, Nammi Ramu, Nammi Rambabu, Duvvi Ramulu, Nammi Kunchaiah, Nammi Pentaiah, Nammi Rambabu and Nammi Rama Krishna in favour of Sree Rama Co-operative Building Society Ltd. represented by its Secretary Sri K.S.A.N.Raju dated 17.03.1983 with respect to the scheduled property therein to an extent of Ac.1.69 cents out of Ac.2.21 cents in Sy.Nos.101/1, 101/2, 101/3, 101/4 & 101/5 which further contains that the ULC permission No.CC7229/83, dated 28.02.1983 was filed therein and it is not an assigned land and the value of the property is Rs.22,000/-.

6. The 5th respondent addressed a letter to the 4th respondent dated 31.03.1983 informing that Sree Rama Co-operative Building Society Ltd., Visakhapatnam purchased the land with an extent of Ac.1-69 Gts and Ac.3- 69 Gts covered by Sy.Nos.101/1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and Sy.Nos.109, 110/2 & 110/3 of Yendada Village from the following persons as detailed below:

S. NoName of the VillageSurvey No.Extent Ac.Gts.Name of the person from whom purchasedDocument No & Date of Registration
1.Yendada101/1, 2, 3, 4 & 51-69Nammi Chandraiah and others2953/83 Dt.17-03-83
2.-Do-109, 110/2 & 110/33-69Saripalli Apparao etc.,2412/83 Dt.03-03-83

It further contains that the lands hold by the registered Cooperative Societies are exempt from t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top