SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1216

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B.S.BHANUMATHI
K. Venkat Reddy – Appellant
Versus
A.Ranjith Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : G. Sravan Kumar
For the Respondent: G.Mani Kumar

Table of Content
1. facts of the case involving plaintiffs seeking injunction. (Para 2 , 3)
2. trial court's handling and observations of measurements. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court objections regarding commissioner's report. (Para 7 , 8)
4. ruling on modification of orders and trial court powers. (Para 9)
5. final decision on revising the trial court's order. (Para 10)

ORDER:

This revision is filed aggrieved by the docket order, dated 27.11.2024, passed in I.A.No.34 of 2024 in O.S.No.1033 of 2023 on the file of the Court of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool, filed by the plaintiff under Order XXVI, Rule 9 and Section 151 C.P.C. to appoint an advocate commissioner by directing him to inspect the petition schedule property, on the urgent process, for the purpose of investigation by directing him to take the assistance of Municipal Surveyor, Kurnool, and to file his report with sketches thereof into Court.

The plaintiff brought suit against the defendants seeking the relief of permanent injunction and to pass a decree in his favour. The defendants resisted the suit by filing written statement. Even after filing of the suit, on 09.11.2023 and 15.11.2023, the defendants tried to encroach i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top