Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
SUMATHI JAGADAM, J.
Vatsavai Rama Badra Raju, S/o. Venkata Rama Raju and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Union Of India, Ministry Of Petroleum Natural Gas, New Delhi, Rep. By Its General Secretary and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 24326 of 2016
Decided On : 14-10-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. (Para 1) |
| 2. writ petition dismissed as infructuous; costs not applied. (Para 2 , 3) |
ORDER :
SUMATHI JAGADAM, J.
Sri K. Devi Prasanna Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri O. Manohar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
3. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
AI
Judicial resources should not be utilized for causes that no longer require adjudication, leading to dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous.
A Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous if the cause for adjudication no longer exists.
A petition may be dismissed as infructuous if the issue at hand has lost relevance.
The court concluded that the writ petition had become infructuous and therefore unnecessary for further adjudication.
Court emphasizes the principle of mootness in legal proceedings.
Writ petition challenging highway land acquisition notifications for filling water bodies dismissed as infructuous upon counsel's report that no relief survives.
A writ petition can be dismissed as infructuous when the subject matter has become moot due to changed circumstances.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
