SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(AP) 1244

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B.KRISHNA MOHAN, J.
Pellurl Sridevi, W/o. P. Narsingrao and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By Its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and Ors. – Respondents 
W.P. Nos.11724, 14142, 21951 of 2020 & 10483 of 2021
Decided On : 30-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: P. Rajasekhar
For the Respondents: Jyothi Eswar Gogineni, GP For Revenue.

The court held that eviction of assignees from assigned land without proper inquiry and notice violates principles of natural justice under the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (POT) Act, 1977.

Headnote:(A) Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (POT) Act, 1977 - Sections 3(1), 3(2) - Proceedings of Mandal Revenue Officer challenged - Eviction order passed due to alleged violation of assignment conditions - Respondents failed to provide proper notice and conduct sufficient inquiry into the assignment's validity. (Paras 2, 8, 15)

(B) Natural Justice - The order was passed without giving adequate notice or opportunity for a hearing to all affected parties, which violates principles of natural justice. (Paras 10, 15)

(C) Public Interest - The court emphasized the need for a fresh inquiry into the assignments to ensure fairness and adherence to legal requirements. (Paras 15, 16)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners purchased assigned land originally allotted to landless persons, which was later resumed by respondents under allegations of violation of assignment conditions. The eviction order was contested based on lack of proper procedure and inquiry.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the Mandal Revenue Officer to conduct a fresh inquiry, ensuring fair opportunity for all parties, and to maintain status quo in the interim.

Issues: Whether the eviction was valid given the lack of proper notice and inquiry; whether principles of natural justice were violated.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the impugned order lacked sufficient inquiry into individual cases and did not adhere to procedural requirements for eviction, necessitating a new examination of the claims.

Result: Writ petitions allowed; eviction orders set aside.

ORDER :

B.KRISHNA MOHAN, J.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. In all these Writ Petitions, the proceedings of the Mandal Revenue Officer, Guntur (5th respondent) dated 10.05.2005 is under challenge. Under the impugned order of the 5th respondent, the subject lands as detailed in the said proceedings were resumed on the ground of violation of the conditions of grant.

3. The impugned order of the 5th respondent contains the table relating to the particulars of the original assignees, the survey numbers and the extents. According to it, different survey numbers are included dealing with different extents of lands.

4. According to the impugned order of the 5th respondent dated 10.05.2005, the total extent of land assigned to the land less poor which was alienated is Ac.163.00 cents and as the assignees violated the conditions of the assignment, it was decided to resume the lands which were assigned previously to the land less poor and who alienated to the others. Accordingly, show-cause notices were issued in Mandal Revenue Office dated 02.06.2003 to the original assignees and some notices were served on the concerned and some were served by mode of affixing the show-cause notice to a stick in the related subject land as they are not available in the village and their whereabouts are not known. Since no explanations have been received from anyone within the stipulated time, the then Mandal Revenue Officer, Guntur passed an Order dated 17.06.2003, resuming the land from the assignees. But, as it was challenged by some of the aggrieved persons of the Anjireddy Nagar Welfare Association represented by its President by name Dr. B. Radha Krishna Murthy, R/o. Naidupet, II line, Guntur by way of Writ Petition No.2801 of 2004 and as per the Orders of the erstwhile High Court dated 22.03.2004 and in terms of the similar Orders passed in W.P.No.19961 of 2003, dated 09.01.2004, again the respondents therein issued notices as contemplated under Rule 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (POT) Rules, 1977, before passing the Eviction Order against them.

5. In pursuance of the Orders of the erstwhile High Court, individual show- cause notices (Form-I notice) were issued to the members of the petitioners’ association and others, who purchased the land to an extent of Ac.102.28 cents in Sy.No.60/3 etc., of Adavithakkellapadu under Section 3(2) of Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (POT) Act, 1977 and the Mandal Revenue Officer, Guntur, issued Rc.No.380/2003-D, dated 08.04.2005 to show-cause within fifteen (15) days on receipt of notices, as to why they should not be summarily evicted from the said assigned lands and as to why any crop or any other product raised on the land or any buildings or any structures erected or anything should not be forfeited. While referring to the said show-cause notice dated 08.04.2005, the Mandal Revenue Officer/5th respondent also gave another tabulation in the said impugned order dated 10.05.2005 mentioning the village name, survey numbers, extent of land, occupiers details and extent of plots in respect of each occupier.

6. Ultimately, after inserting these two above said tabular forms, he observed that the show-cause notices (Form I notices) were served by affixing show-cause notices to a stick in the related subject land as their whereabouts are not known. Consolidated show-cause notices (Form I notices) were also published on the notice boards of the concerned Panchayat Office, MPDO Guntur and MRO, Guntur. The consolidated show cause notices (Form I notices) were also served to the petitioners’ association and Green City Colony. The Secretary, Anjireddy Nagar Welfare Association and representative of the Green City Colony have submitted explanations on behalf of their association members stating that the petitioners (members) are the absolute owners of the land mentioned in the notices and purchased the same for considerable amoun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top