IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
Kolan Rukka Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Revenue Department, reptd. by its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petitions detail the challenge against land notices. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 7) |
| 2. respondent's arguments on land assignment and legality. (Para 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 3. court's analysis of delay and jurisdiction in appeals. (Para 10 , 13 , 18) |
| 4. criteria for valid resumption proceedings imposed by law. (Para 20 , 22) |
| 5. court's final order declaring notices null and void. (Para 23 , 24) |
ORDER :
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J.
Writ Petition No.10920 of 2020 is filed to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring Form-I notice bearing No.B/361/2019, dated 10.07.2020, issued by respondent No.4, at the instance of respondent Nos.1 to 3, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Writ Petition No.11110 of 2020 is filed to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring Form-II notice bearing No.B/361/2019, dated 10.07.2020, issued by respondent No.4, at the instance of respondent Nos.1 to 3, as illegal and arbitrary.
3. Writ Petition No.11897 of 2020 is filed to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring the order, vide proceedings No.B/77/2020, dated 09.07.2020, passed by respondent No.3, confirming the order, vide proceedings No.B/3854/2015, dated 07.01.2016, passed by the then Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Quthbullapur Manda
Sunkara Sujana Vs. District Collector, Ranga Reddy District and others
B.Adinarayana Murthy Vs. Collector, Anantapur
Thripuravalam Krishna Reddy Vs. Joint Collector
Authorities must prove land was assigned with non-alienation conditions to initiate resumption proceedings; failure to establish this invalidates the actions taken.
Section 4(1)(b)(ii), but the Government raised a plea that the petitioners are not entitled to restore the land in view of the amendment of Section 4 by Act No.8 of 2008.
Both transferor and transferee must receive proper notices in resumption proceedings to uphold natural justice and procedural fairness.
The court established that both transferor and transferee must receive proper notices in resumption proceedings under the Act, ensuring compliance with natural justice.
The court established that adherence to procedural requirements in eviction proceedings under the A.P. Assigned Land Prohibition of Transfers Act is essential for the validity of such orders.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.